Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS sklep III DoR 160/2015 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2016:III.DOR.160.2015 AI generated

Supreme Court allows partial review of board dismissal ruling due to missing statutory grounds.

Case Number VSRS sklep III DoR 160/2015
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia granted the applicant's request for review permission regarding a specific legal question concerning the nullity of a board's dismissal decision. The applicant argued that the board failed to meet the dismissal conditions set forth in the second paragraph of Article 268 of the Companies Act, yet the board's nullity was deemed an appropriate sanction. The court decided to permit the review only on this specific point because it had not yet ruled on it, while denying permission for other issues where review conditions were not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 268 paragraph 2 of the Companies Act; Article 367a paragraph 1 of the Act on Civil Procedure Law: Review permission is granted only for specific legal questions not yet adjudicated by the reviewing court, even if other review conditions are absent.

Keywords

AI generated
review permission Companies Act board dismissal nullity sanction civil procedure law partial review statutory conditions

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 268 paragraph 2 of the Companies Act
Article 367a paragraph 1 of the Act on Civil Procedure Law
AI generated
Sklep VIII Ips 396/2007
Supreme Court dismisses appeal, remands corporate director dismissal case to civil court for jurisdictional review.
VSRS Sklep X Ips 206/2016
Slovenian Supreme Court dismisses administrative appeal review due to non-fulfillment of statutory admissibility conditions.
Sklep III Ips 79/2011
Supreme Court dismisses appeal in labor dispute where disputed amount under 200k EUR threshold. Appeal rejected due to statutory monetary limit for business cases. Plaintiff bears costs as review was inadmissible.
VSRS sklep III DoR 133/2015
Supreme Court allows review regarding misapplication of law on nullity versus revocation claims under ZGD-1.
VSL Sodba I Cpg 421/2022
Appeal dismissed: formal errors in board removal do not invalidate corporate acts without substantive grounds.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlogu se ugodi in se revizija dopusti glede vprašanja:

- Ali je v primeru, da za sprejem sklepa nadzornega sveta o odpoklicu člana uprave niso bili podani pogoji za odpoklic iz drugega odstavka 268. člena Zakona o gospodarskih družbah (ZGD-1), ničnost sklepa nadzornega sveta primerna sankcija?

[JEDRO]

Predlogu se ugodi in se revizija dopusti glede vprašanja ali je v primeru, da za sprejem sklepa nadzornega sveta o odpoklicu člana uprave niso bili podani pogoji za odpoklic iz drugega odstavka 268. člena ZGD-1, ničnost sklepa nadzornega sveta primerna sankcija.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče druge stopnje je v delu, relevantnem za revizijsko presojo, na podlagi 268. člena ZGD-1 pravnomočno potrdilo delno sodbo prvostopenjskega sodišča o ugotovitvi ničnosti sklepa nadzornega sveta toženke o odpoklicu tožnika kot predsednika uprave.

2. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje toženka vlaga predlog za dopustitev revizije.

3. Revizijsko sodišče ugotavlja, da so pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku izpolnjeni glede pravnega vprašanja, navedenega v izreku sklepa, saj revizijsko sodišče o njem še ni odločalo. Revizijo je zato v tem obsegu dopustilo.

4. Glede preostalih vprašanj pogoji za dopustitev revizije niso izpolnjeni.