Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS sklep III DoR 102/2015 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2015:III.DOR.102.2015 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses revision request as statutory conditions under Article 367a ZPP are not met.

Case Number VSRS sklep III DoR 102/2015
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the defendant's request for permission to file a revision against the second-instance judgment. The first instance court partially awarded the plaintiff 40,000 EUR as a subcontractor to the defendant contractor, while the second instance court upheld this partial award and dismissed the defendant's appeal. Since the conditions for granting a revision under Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure were not satisfied, the Supreme Court declined the request in accordance with Article 367c.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure; Article 367c of the Code of Civil Procedure: A revision request is inadmissible if the statutory conditions for its permission are not met, resulting in the dismissal of the request.

Keywords

AI generated
revision request permission conditions Code of Civil Procedure partial award contractor liability

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 367c of the Code of Civil Procedure
AI generated
VSL sodba I Cpg 983/2010
Appeal dismissed; procedural error regarding witness hearing did not affect outcome on unpaid construction claims.
VSRS Sklep III Ips 85/2015
Supreme Court dismisses direct payment claim against principal contractor without subcontractor conditions met. Direct payment rules do not override general contract law principles. Court rules against mandatory direct payments absent statutory conditions. Direct payment rules require strict adherence to statutory conditions. Contract law principles prevail over administrative payment directives. Subcontractor rights depend on specific legal conditions being met.
VSRS Sodba II Ips 30/2017
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on contract payment dispute, upholding lower courts' findings on subcontractor claims.
VSL sodba I Cpg 1942/2014
Court dismisses appeal against contractor's claim for 10% retention payment based on interim certification.
Sodba III Ips 46/2008
Contract price per unit does not exclude Art. 652 OZ when contractor acts without authority.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Ker niso izpolnjeni pogoji, ki jih za dopustitev revizije določa 367.a člen ZPP, je Vrhovno sodišče predlog toženke v skladu z drugim odstavkom 367.c člena ZPP zavrnilo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je na podlagi 631. člena Obligacijskega zakonika delno ugodilo tožbenemu zahtevku, in sicer za plačilo 40.000,00 EUR. Presodilo je, da je v tem delu utemeljen neposredni zahtevek tožnice kot podizvajalke do toženke kot naročnice za vtoževano terjatev na podlagi izvedenih del. Sodišče druge stopnje je zavrnilo pritožbo tožene stranke ter potrdilo ugodilni del izpodbijane sodbe.

2. Toženka je zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje vložila predlog za dopustitev revizije.

3. Ker niso izpolnjeni pogoji, ki jih za dopustitev revizije določa 367.a člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku (v nadaljevanju ZPP), je Vrhovno sodišče predlog toženke v skladu z drugim odstavkom 367.c člena ZPP zavrnilo.