Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS sklep III DoR 115/2015 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2015:III.DOR.115.2015 AI generated

Court dismisses revision request against shipowner's liability judgment due to lack of active standing.

Case Number VSRS sklep III DoR 115/2015
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court rejected the plaintiff's petition for permission to appeal, upholding the lower court's dismissal of her claim for ship damage compensation. The plaintiff failed to demonstrate active standing because she was not the vessel's owner and could not prove her status as a lessee entitled to claim damages. Consequently, the court ruled that the statutory conditions for allowing a revision were not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

367.a ZPP; 367.c ZPP: A revision petition is inadmissible if the applicant fails to establish active standing or other conditions required by law.

Keywords

AI generated
active standing revision petition shipowner liability lessee status ZPP conditions

Cited Legislation

AI generated
367.a ZPP
367.c ZPP
AI generated
VSC Sodba Cp 298/2017
Lease termination damages converted to compensation; court partially allows appeal regarding execution order.
VSK sodba Cpg 409/2014
Unjust enrichment claim dismissed because benefit transfer occurred between insurer and defendant, not plaintiff. Court allowed partial claim for repair value.
VSRS Sodba III Ips 57/2015
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; insurer not liable to inform policyholder of premium default in third-party benefit contracts.
Sodba II Ips 413/2001
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on procedural grounds and substantive liability for third-party debt assumption.
VSL Sodba VII Kp 68923/2023
Appeal dismissed; conviction upheld for damaging third-party rights despite identity discrepancy in victim company name.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Predlog se zavrne.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je v celoti zavrnilo primarni in podredni tožbeni zahtevek za plačilo odškodnine zaradi napak plovila, ker aktivna legitimacija ni bila podana. Sodišče prve stopnje je namreč ugotovilo, da tožnica ni bila lastnica spornega plovila, medtem ko svojega upravičenja za uveljavljanje odškodninskega zahtevka preko svojega statusa leasingojemalke ni izkazala. Pritožbeno sodišče je zavrnilo pritožbo tožnice in potrdilo izpodbijano sodbo.

2. Tožnica je zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje vložila predlog za dopustitev revizije.

3. Ker niso izpolnjeni pogoji, ki jih za dopustitev revizije določa 367.a člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku (v nadaljevanju ZPP), je Vrhovno sodišče predlog tožnice v skladu z drugim odstavkom 367.c člena ZPP zavrnilo.