Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS sklep III DoR 126/2015 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2015:III.DOR.126.2015 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses review application as statutory conditions for admissibility under ZPP are not met.

Case Number VSRS sklep III DoR 126/2015
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicant's request for leave to file a cassation appeal. The first-instance court had dismissed claims for commission payment because the Insurance Act does not mandate premium payment when no insurance intermediary agreement exists. The applicant argued for review, but the Supreme Court found the procedural prerequisites for admissibility under Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure were not satisfied. Consequently, the application was rejected pursuant to Article 367c(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

367.a člen ZPP; 367.c(2) člen ZPP: The Supreme Court must reject a request for leave to file a cassation appeal if the statutory conditions for admissibility prescribed by Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure are not met.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal admissibility Code of Civil Procedure insurance intermediary agreement mandatory premium payment review application rejection

Cited Legislation

AI generated
367.a člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku
Ker niso izpolnjeni pogoji, ki jih za dopustitev revizije določa 367.a člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku, je sodišče predlog tožnice v skladu z drugim odstavkom 367.c člena ZPP zavrnilo.
367.c(2) člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku
Zakon o zavarovalništvu
AI generated
VSK sodba Cpg 38/2013
Appeal dismissed; broker's claim for commission rejected due to lack of causation and immoral dual agency.
VSL Sodba I Cpg 10/2023
Appeal dismissed; insurance intermediary's claim for commission rejected due to lack of agreement and relative effect of contracts.
VSC Sodba Cpg 126/2020
Appeal dismissed; court held first-instance judgment valid as no surprise occurred despite procedural flexibility.
Sodba II Ips 206/99
Appeal dismissed; mandatory termination clause in agency contract prevails over strict interpretation of adhesion contract terms.
VSRS sklep II DoR 29/2016
Sodišče prve stopnje je obdržalo v veljavi sklep o izvršbi Okrajnega sodišča v Ljubljani VL 58762/2014 z dne 8.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Ker niso izpolnjeni pogoji, ki jih za dopustitev revizije določa 367.a člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku, je sodišče predlog tožnice v skladu z drugim odstavkom 367.c člena ZPP zavrnilo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je zavrnilo tožbeni zahtevki (spor je izšel iz izvršbe) za plačilo provizije zavarovalnemu posredniku, saj je presodilo, da Zakon o zavarovalništvu (ZZavar) ne določa „prisilnega“ plačila premije v primerih, ko zavarovalnica in zavarovalni posrednik nimata (več) sklenjene pogodbe o zavarovalnem posredovanju. Pritožbeno sodišče je zavrnilo pritožbo tožnice in potrdilo izpodbijano sodbo.

2. Tožnica je zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje vložila predlog za dopustitev revizije.

3. Ker niso izpolnjeni pogoji, ki jih za dopustitev revizije določa 367.a člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku (v nadaljevanju ZPP), je Vrhovno sodišče predlog tožnice v skladu z drugim odstavkom 367.c člena ZPP zavrnilo.