Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS sklep III DoR 136/2015 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2015:III.DOR.136.2015 AI generated

Appeal allowed regarding whether a bank guarantee obligation constitutes a promise of action under OZ Art. 130(3).

Case Number VSRS sklep III DoR 136/2015
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia granted the leave for appeal regarding a specific legal question. The plaintiff had previously lost a lawsuit seeking a non-revocable bank guarantee to rectify errors in the guarantee period. The court determined that the conditions for allowing the appeal were met based on the question posed in the ruling.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 130(3) of the Obligations Act; Article 367a(1) of the Act on Civil Procedure Law: The Supreme Court may grant leave for appeal when a specific legal question regarding the interpretation of statutory provisions is raised, even if the lower court's decision is otherwise final.

Keywords

AI generated
leave for appeal bank guarantee obligations act promise of action civil procedure law legal question supreme court

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 130(3) of the Obligations Act
Article 367a(1) of the Act on Civil Procedure Law
AI generated
VSK sodba Cpg 72/2014
Bank guarantee with 'on first demand' clause renders contract breach assessment legally irrelevant for payment obligation.
VSRS Sklep III Ips 26/2016
Supreme Court allows withdrawal of appeal under ZPP, dismissing review proceedings due to voluntary withdrawal.
VSK sodba Cpg 156/2015
Appeal dismissed; court holds enforcing third-party dependent obligations is inadmissible under Contract Law.
VSL Sodba I Cp 832/2020
Appeal dismissed; seller's duty to deliver documents to buyer remains if not delegated to manager.
VSM sodba I Cpg 152/2007
Court allows appeal against bank guarantee claim, ruling independent guarantees limit liability to specific conditions met.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali zaveza izvajalca izročiti bančno garancijo pomeni obljubo dejanja tretjega po prvem odstavku 130. člena OZ.

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali zaveza izvajalca izročiti bančno garancijo pomeni obljubo dejanja tretjega po prvem odstavku 130. člena OZ.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je zavrnilo primarni in podredni tožbeni zahtevek. Z obema zahtevkoma je tožeča stranka uveljavljala izročitev nepreklicne bančne garancije za odpravo napak v garancijskem roku, plačljive na prvi poziv, v višini 59.394,88 EUR, z veljavnostjo 5 let in 30 dni od dneva izročitve te bančne garancije (primarni zahtevek) oziroma z veljavnostjo do 13. 8. 2016 (podredni zahtevek).

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je zavrnilo pritožbo tožeče stranke in potrdilo sodbo sodišča prve stopnje.

3. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje tožeča stranka vlaga predlog za dopustitev revizije.

4. Revizijsko sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku glede zastavljenega vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku sklepa. Revizijo je zato dopustilo.