Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS sklep III DoR 111/2015 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2015:III.DOR.111.2015 AI generated

Supreme Court allows appeal regarding whether a heat supplier must disclose calculation criteria for a condominium owner's share in debt recovery proceedings.

Case Number VSRS sklep III DoR 111/2015
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia granted the applicant's request to permit an appeal on a specific legal question. The applicant, a heat supplier, sought to recover unpaid debts from a condominium owner and argued that disclosure of calculation criteria for the owner's share was necessary. The court ruled that the conditions for allowing an appeal under the relevant procedural law were met because the question raised a significant legal issue regarding the scope of disclosure obligations in such proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku, 367.a odst. 1: An appeal is permitted when a question of law is raised that concerns the interpretation of the law or the application of a legal provision to the facts of the case, provided the question is of general legal significance.

Keywords

AI generated
Zakon o pravdnem postopku dopustitev revizije etažni lastnik toplotna energija izterjave terjatve merila izračuna pravni vprašanje

Cited Legislation

AI generated
367.a odst. 1 Zakona o pravdnem postopku
AI generated
VSL sodba I Cpg 227/2011
Appeal dismissed; enforcement order upheld because debt not due under contract terms.
VSL Sklep II Cp 2781/2017
Appeal allowed; court reverses first instance judgment on public procurement payment dispute regarding unforeseen circumstances.
VSL sklep I Cpg 1032/2000
Appeal allowed; first instance court violated directness and adversarial principles by relying on indirect evidence.
VSL sklep II Cp 2661/2012
Appeal allowed; foreign authors enjoy copyright protection under ZASP; burden of proof on defendant.
VSL sodba in sklep I Cpg 746/2010
Appeal partially allowed; execution proceeding remanded due to failure to identify debt subject.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlogu se ugodi in se revizija dopusti glede vprašanja:

Ali je tožeča stranka kot dobavitelj toplotne energije dolžna v pravdnem postopku zaradi izterjave neplačane terjatve, ki ga vodi zoper neplačnika, ki je prejemnik toplotne energije, navajati merila in elemente, iz katerih bo razviden izračun deleža, ki ga je dolžan plačati etažni lastnik?

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti vprašanja ali je tožeča stranka kot dobavitelj toplotne energije dolžna v pravdnem postopku zaradi izterjave neplačane terjatve, ki ga vodi zoper neplačnika, ki je prejemnik toplotne energije, navajati merila in elemente, iz katerih bo razviden izračun deleža, ki ga je dolžan plačati etažni lastnik.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je razveljavilo sklep o izvršbi, na podlagi katerega je morala tožena stranka tožeči stranki plačati 22.180,44 EUR s pripadki, ter tožbeni zahtevek zavrnilo.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je prvostopenjsko sodbo potrdilo.

3. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje vlaga tožeča stranka predlog za dopustitev revizije.

4. Revizijsko sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku glede zastavljenega vprašanja. Revizijo je zato dopustilo.