Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS sklep III DoR 95/2015 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2015:III.DOR.95.2015 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses review application as statutory conditions for admissibility under ZPP are not met.

Case Number VSRS sklep III DoR 95/2015
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the defendant's application for review, citing non-compliance with the statutory requirements for admissibility under Article 367.a of the Code of Civil Procedure. Although the lower courts partially ruled in favor of the plaintiff regarding a pension claim and social contribution errors, the review threshold was not satisfied. Consequently, the Supreme Court declined to examine the merits of the case, leaving the second-instance judgment in force.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367.a of the Code of Civil Procedure; Article 367.c, paragraph 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure: A review application is inadmissible if the applicant fails to demonstrate that the lower court's decision contains a significant error of law or fact that could have changed the outcome.

Keywords

AI generated
review application admissibility Code of Civil Procedure significant error of law pension claim dispute social contribution assessment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367.a of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 367.c, paragraph 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure
AI generated
VSL sklep I Cpg 1105/2014
Appeal court quashes first instance judgment regarding direct payment to subcontractor due to missing contractual authorization.
Sodba in sklep II Ips 605/93
Court holds that adjusting damages for inflation does not constitute a change of claim under Slovenian law.
Sklep III Ips 115/2001
Supreme Court dismisses protection of legality request as time-barred due to correct application of economic dispute procedural rules.
VSL sodba I Cp 2555/2016
Appeal partially allowed; court reduces damages for double compensation of same harm from assault and fear.
Sodba III Ips 117/2011
Supreme Court dismisses appeal, allowing second-instance court to change judgment without trial when evidence is insufficient.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Ker niso izpolnjeni pogoji, ki jih za dopustitev revizije določa 367.a člen ZPP, je Vrhovno sodišče predlog toženke v skladu z drugim odstavkom 367.c člena ZPP zavrnilo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Prvostopenjsko sodišče je delno ugodilo tožbenemu zahtevku, saj je na podlagi 272. člena Zakona o pokojninskem in invalidskem zavarovanju presodilo o utemeljenosti regresnega zahtevka zoper toženko za znesek 5.485,25 EUR s pripadajočimi zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi in pravdnimi stroški. Pritožbeno sodišče je zavrnilo pritožbo toženke, medtem ko je delno ugodilo pritožbi tožnice zaradi zmotne presoje o višini soprispevka toženke ter tožbenemu zahtevku ugodilo še za 5.485,25 EUR s pripadki.

2. Toženka je zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje vložila predlog za dopustitev revizije.

3. Ker niso izpolnjeni pogoji, ki jih za dopustitev revizije določa 367.a člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku (v nadaljevanju ZPP), je Vrhovno sodišče predlog toženke v skladu z drugim odstavkom 367.c člena ZPP zavrnilo.