Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS sklep III DoR 108/2015 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2015:III.DOR.108.2015 AI generated

Supreme Court allows review regarding insurance coverage and premium payment timing at risk onset.

Case Number VSRS sklep III DoR 108/2015
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia granted the request for leave to appeal regarding a specific legal question. The lower courts had ruled in favor of the plaintiff on the insurance claim while rejecting the defendant's appeal. The court permitted the review because the defendant raised a valid issue about whether coverage and payment obligations were triggered at the risk's onset despite the first premium installment not yet being paid.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) pr. 367.a odst. 1: The Supreme Court may grant leave for appeal when a party raises a question of law concerning the timing of insurance coverage and payment obligations relative to the occurrence of the insured event, even if the initial premium has not been paid.

Keywords

AI generated
insurance coverage timing premium payment obligation risk onset event leave for appeal ZPP article 367a automobile insurance payment installment status

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Zakon o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) pr. 367.a odst. 1
AI generated
Sodba II Ips 351/99
Court rejects appeal against car damage claim where driver under alcohol caused loss to insured vehicle owner.
Sodba II Ips 795/2008
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; updated insurance terms during coverage period do not alter original contract scope.
Sklep II Dor 14/2009
Supreme Court dismisses appeal request for leave as incomplete due to vague legal rule citation and general practice claims.
VSL Sodba I Cp 887/2020
Appeal dismissed; insurer liable for car damage when accident and damage are proven to be causally linked.
VSC sklep Cp 634/2002
Appeal allowed; court reversed first instance for misapplication of law regarding self-repaired vehicle damage valuation.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali sta bila zavarovalno kritje in obveznost tožene stranke za izplačilo zavarovalnine podana ob nastanku zavarovalnega primera, čeprav do tega dne prvi obrok zavarovalne premije še ni bil plačan.

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali sta bila zavarovalno kritje in obveznost tožene stranke za izplačilo zavarovalnine podana ob nastanku zavarovalnega primera, čeprav do tega dne prvi obrok zavarovalne premije še ni bil plačan.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je v delu, relevantnem za odločitev o predlogu za dopustitev revizije, ugodilo zahtevku za plačilo zavarovalnine iz naslova avtomobilskega kasko zavarovanja (II. točka izreka).

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je zavrnilo pritožbo tožene stranke in v izpodbijanem delu potrdilo sodbo sodišča prve stopnje.

3. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje tožena stranka vlaga predlog za dopustitev revizije.

4. Revizijsko sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) glede zastavljenega vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku sklepa. Revizijo je zato dopustilo.