Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS sklep II Ips 298/2014 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2015:II.IPS.298.2014 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeals withdrawn by parties via settlement agreement covering litigation costs.

Case Number VSRS sklep II Ips 298/2014
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia dismissed the appeals lodged by both parties against the second-instance judgment. Although the appeals were formally filed, the parties subsequently withdrew them through a court settlement agreement dated September 8, 2015, which also stipulated that each party would bear their own appeal costs. The court ruled that this withdrawal was effective because it occurred before the Supreme Court had rendered a decision on the appeals.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) 334. člen; 383. člen; 165. člen; 159. člen: Appeals may be withdrawn by parties at any time before the court's decision, and such withdrawal via settlement agreement is effective even if the court has not yet ruled on the appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of appeal court settlement agreement litigation costs allocation effectiveness of withdrawal supreme court procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
334. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku
383. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku
165. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku
159. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se, da sta reviziji umaknjeni.

Vsaka stranka krije svoje stroške revizijskega postopka.

[JEDRO]

Umik revizij temelji na sodni poravnavi, ki vsebuje tudi sporazum o stroških revizijskega postopka.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je toženki naložilo plačilo 540.483,84 EUR, sicer pa je tožbeni zahtevek zavrnilo.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbi pravdnih strank zavrnilo in sodbo sodišča prve stopnje potrdilo.

3. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje sta reviziji vložili obe pravdni stranki, vsaka od njiju pa je tudi odgovorila na revizijo nasprotne stranke.

4. Po vložitvi revizij sta ju pravdni stranki umaknili. To sta storili s sodno poravnavo z dne 8. 9. 2015, ki jo je Vrhovno sodišče prejelo 11. 9. 2015. Ker do tedaj o revizijah še ni odločilo, je njun umik učinkovit (drugi odstavek 334. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku – v nadaljevanju ZPP – v zvezi s 383. členom ZPP).

5. Umik obeh revizij temelji na sodni poravnavi, ki določa tudi, da vsaka stranka krije svoje revizijske stroške (prvi odstavek 165. člena ZPP v zvezi s prvim odstavkom 159. člena ZPP).