Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL sklep I Cpg 1016/2015 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2015:I.CPG.1016.2015 AI generated

Appeal withdrawn before decision; appellant bears own costs under ZPP provisions.

Case Number VSL sklep I Cpg 1016/2015
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Higher Court in Ljubljana accepted the appellant's withdrawal of the appeal filed on May 25, 2015, noting the decision had not yet been rendered. The appellant had previously intervened in a commercial dispute regarding a statement of entry, but the lower court rejected this intervention. Since the withdrawal occurred before the appellate court issued its ruling, the appellant is solely responsible for the procedural costs incurred.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

2nd paragraph of Article 334 of the Civil Procedure Act; withdrawal of appeal before decision renders the appeal ineffective, and the withdrawing party bears all associated costs.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of appeal commercial dispute procedural costs civil procedure act appellant liability

Cited Legislation

AI generated
2nd paragraph of Article 334 of the Civil Procedure Act
1st paragraph of Article 165 of the Civil Procedure Act
1st paragraph of Article 154 of the Civil Procedure Act
AI generated
VSL Sklep I Cpg 77/2024
Appeal dismissed; plaintiff failed to prove legal interest for intervention, only economic interest in debt repayment.
VSL Sklep I Cp 2057/2020
Appeal dismissed; factual interest insufficient for intervention; possession rights not decided in nuisance proceedings.
VSL Sklep II Cp 789/2023
Appeal court allows creditor's intervention in inheritance partition suit due to legal interest in estate scope.
VSL Sklep I Cpg 119/2021
Appeal dismissed; third party must prove personal legal interest, not just economic stake, under ZPP Art. 199.
VSC sklep Cp 122/2008
Appeal dismissed; intervenient must prove legal interest in court appearance regardless of party explanation.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I. Ugotovi se, da je pritožnik pritožbo umaknil.

II. Pritožnik sam nosi stroške postopka.

[JEDRO]

Dne 12.08.2015 je predlagatelj umaknil pritožbo z dne 25. 5. 2015. Ker višje sodišče pred tem še ni izdalo odločbe (2. odstavek 334. člena ZPP), je umik pritožbe vzelo na znanje.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Predlagatelj je dne 27. 2. 2015 na Okrožno sodišče v Ljubljani podal izjavo o vstopu v gospodarski spor na strani tožene stranke. Sodišče prve stopnje je s sklepom z dne 5. 5. 2015 zavrnilo predlagateljevo stransko intervencijo, predlagatelj pa se je zoper sklep pravočasno pritožil.

2. Dne 12.08.2015 je predlagatelj umaknil pritožbo z dne 25. 5. 2015. Ker višje sodišče pred tem še ni izdalo odločbe (drugi odstavek 334. člena ZPP), je umik pritožbe vzelo na znanje.

3. Izrek o stroških temelji na prvem odstavku 165. člena ZPP v zvezi s prvim odstavkom 154. člena ZPP. Ker je predlagatelj umaknil pritožbo, sam nosi svoje pritožbene stroške.