Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL sklep II Cp 2840/2014 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2015:II.CP.2840.2014 AI generated

Appeal allowed; inheritance court ruling voided due to lack of legal basis and deceased's estate.

Case Number VSL sklep II Cp 2840/2014
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court granted the appeal and annulled the lower court's supplementary ruling on inheritance. The heirs agreed that the disputed property did not belong to the deceased's estate, and no one had submitted a request for an inheritance ruling regarding her. Consequently, the court found no legal grounds for the lower court's decision and set it aside.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o dedovanju; Zakon o pravdnem postopku: A supplementary ruling on inheritance is void if the disputed property is not part of the deceased's estate and no request for such a ruling was filed.

Keywords

AI generated
supplementary inheritance ruling deceased estate scope lack of legal basis annulment of judgment heirs agreement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
365. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku
163. člen Zakona o dedovanju
AI generated
VSL sklep I Cp 3696/2010
Appeal allowed: Inheritance court must allow heirs of deceased heir to participate and determine shares via transmission.
VSL Sklep II Cp 2527/2017
Appeal allowed; inheritance court must include gifts to heirs in estate value for necessary share calculation under ZD.
VSL Sklep I Cp 1442/2020
Appeal dismissed because inheritance appeal filed one day after statutory deadline expired due to pandemic suspension.
VSL sklep II Cp 1811/99
Appeal dismissed because appellant lacked standing and claim was obligational not hereditary.
VSL sklep II Cp 201/97
Appeal allowed: Late-found shares belong to sole heir due to binding nature of prior final inheritance judgment.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožbi se ugodi in se izpodbijani dodatni sklep o dedovanju razveljavi.

[JEDRO]

Dediči so soglasni, da sporno premoženje ne sodi v zapuščino pokojne. Predloga za izdajo dodatnega sklepa o dedovanju po njej nihče ni podal. Podlage za izdajo izpodbijanega sklepa zato ni.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Z izpodbijanim dodatnim sklepom o dedovanju je sodišče prve stopnje ugotovilo, da dodatna zapuščina obsega ½ nepremičnine z ID znakom ... ter A. B., P. B. in A. B. dodelilo vsakemu po 1/3 dodatne zapuščine.

2. Zoper tak sklep se pravočasno pritožujejo vsi dediči. Navajajo, da izdaje dodatnega sklepa o dedovanju po M. S. niso predlagali, saj ob smrti ni bila več lastnica v izreku navedene nepremičnine. V letu 1998 jo je prodala A. B. Slednja je predlagala sodišču prve stopnje, da izda dodatni sklep o dedovanju po S. O. S. glede njemu solastnega deleža iste nepremičnine.

3. Pritožba je utemeljena.

4. Dediči so soglasni, da sporno premoženje ne sodi v zapuščino pokojne M. S. Predloga za izdajo dodatnega sklepa o dedovanju po njej nihče ni podal. Podlage za izdajo izpodbijanega sklepa zato ni. Višje sodišče je zaradi opisanega pritožbi dedičev ugodilo in izpodbijani sklep razveljavilo (3. točka 365. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku v zvezi s 163. členom Zakona o dedovanju).