Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep I Up 144/2015 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2015:I.UP.144.2015 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal withdrawal case where plaintiff withdrew appeal before final ruling.

Case Number VSRS Sklep I Up 144/2015
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia formally noted the withdrawal of the appellant's appeal before issuing a final decision. The appellant had lodged an appeal against the first-instance court's rejection of their request for interim relief on June 22, 2015, but withdrew it via letter on July 9, 2015. The court ruled that since the withdrawal occurred prior to the Supreme Court's deliberation, the appeal was legally extinguished under the relevant procedural laws.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o upravnem sporu; Zakon o pravdnem postopku: A party may withdraw an appeal filed with the court of second instance before that court issues a decision, thereby terminating the proceedings on that specific request.

Keywords

AI generated
administrative appeal withdrawal second instance procedure termination of appeal procedural law application court decision finality

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Zakon o upravnem sporu (ZUS-1)
Zakon o pravdnem postopku (ZPP)
AI generated
VSM Sklep I Cp 570/2022
Court partially allows appeal on costs, ruling defendant's delay after plaintiff's withdrawal constitutes procedural delay warranting separate cost award.
VSL Sklep II Cp 605/2020
Appeal dismissed; possession disturbance claim rejected due to filing after 30-day statute of limitations.
VSL sklep I Cp 4282/2010
Appeal dismissed; withdrawal due to settlement means each party bears own costs under ZPP 159.
VDSS sklep Pdp 957/2016
Appeal court quashes first instance dismissal for premature contract termination, ruling it was a fixed-term expiry.
VSRS Sklep I Up 51/2022
Supreme Court dismisses appeal against administrative court ruling on tariff setting, confirming general act status and lack of standing.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se, da je tožeča stranka umaknila pritožbo.

[JEDRO]

Zoper 2. točko izreka navedenega sklepa je tožeča stranka dne 22. 6. 2015 vložila pritožbo, ki pa jo je z dopisom z dne 9. 7. 2015 umaknila.

Ker je v tem primeru tožeča stranka pritožbo umaknila, preden je Vrhovno sodišče o njej odločilo, je Vrhovno sodišče v skladu z določbami ZPP in ZUS-1 ugotovilo njen umik.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je s sklepom I U 511/2015-27 z dne 16. 6. 2015 zavrglo predlog tožeče stranke za obnovo postopka (1. točka izreka), zavrglo zahtevo tožeče stranke za izdajo začasne odredbe (2. točka izreka) in odločilo, da vsaka stranka trpi svoje stroške postopka (3. točka izreka).

2. Zoper 2. točko izreka navedenega sklepa je tožeča stranka dne 22. 6. 2015 vložila pritožbo, ki pa jo je z dopisom z dne 9. 7. 2015 umaknila.

3. Po določbi prvega odstavka 22. člena Zakona o upravnem sporu (v nadaljevanju ZUS-1) se za vprašanja postopka, ki v ZUS-1 niso urejena, primerno uporabljajo določbe Zakona o pravdnem postopku (v nadaljevanju ZPP). Vprašanje umika pritožbe v ZUS-1 ni urejeno, ZPP pa v drugem odstavku 334. člena določa, da lahko stranka, dokler sodišče druge stopnje ne izda odločbe, umakne že vloženo pritožbo. Ker je v tem primeru tožeča stranka pritožbo umaknila, preden je Vrhovno sodišče o njej odločilo, je Vrhovno sodišče v skladu z navedenimi določbami ZPP in ZUS-1 ugotovilo njen umik.

4. V zadevi je na podlagi drugega odstavka 14. člena ZUS-1 odločala sodnica posameznica.