Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS sklep I R 89/2015 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2015:I.R.89.2015 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses repeated transfer of jurisdiction requests due to lack of legal interest.

Case Number VSRS sklep I R 89/2015
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia dismissed the plaintiff's fourth request to transfer jurisdiction to another competent court. The plaintiff argued that justice had been delayed for nine years and claimed the judge was biased, but the court noted this was a substantively identical claim previously rejected. The court ruled that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a legal interest in repeating the request on the same grounds.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

67. člen ZPP; A party cannot repeatedly request a transfer of jurisdiction to a different competent court when the request is substantively identical to previous ones and no new legal interest is established.

Keywords

AI generated
transfer of jurisdiction legal interest repeated request substantive identity ZPP article 67 procedural economy lack of interest

Cited Legislation

AI generated
67. člen ZPP
Vrhovno sodišče je v tej pravdi že večkrat zavrnilo tožničine predloge za prenos pristojnosti (67. člen ZPP), nazadnje s sklepom I R 38/2015 z dne 2.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I R 38/2015
Supreme Court rejects transfer of jurisdiction request based on subjective fear of bias without objective grounds.
AI generated
Sklep II DoR 263/2009
Supreme Court rejects appeal against divorce property division, ruling separate acquisition precludes joint ownership.
VSRS sklep I R 38/2015
Supreme Court rejects transfer of jurisdiction request based on subjective fear of bias without objective grounds.
VSL sodba I Cp 69/2009
Appeal court partially allowed claim regarding unjust enrichment but dismissed request for specific property division.
VSL sodba in sklep I Cp 4190/2011
Appeal partially allowed; cohabitation established but property contribution ignored causing procedural error.
VSL sodba I Cp 2527/2014
Court partially allows co-ownership claim in extramarital relationship based on equal statutory shares regardless of funding source.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

Tožnica ne izkazuje pravnega interesa za ponavljanje na vsebinsko identično trditveno podlago oprtega predloga.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Med pravdnima strankama je pri Okrožnem sodišču v Krškem v teku pravdni postopek zaradi ugotovitve njunega skupnega premoženja in deležev na tem premoženju ter izstavitve zemljiškoknjižne listine in plačila.

2. Tožnica z vlogo z dne 29. 6. 2015 že četrtič predlaga prenos pristojnosti za odločanje na drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče. Navaja, da pravda teče že deveto leto, sodnica pa je ne zaključi in tudi sicer ne ravna pravilno, je pristranska in tožnico ponižuje.

3. Predlog ni dovoljen.

4. Vrhovno sodišče je v tej pravdi že večkrat zavrnilo tožničine predloge za prenos pristojnosti (67. člen ZPP), nazadnje s sklepom I R 38/2015 z dne 2. 4. 2015. Tokratni predlog tožnice je vsebinsko enak prejšnjim, saj ne vsebuje novih razlogov, ki še niso bili obravnavani. Ker tožnica na ta način ne more doseči ponovnega vsebinskega odločanja o isti stvari in ne izkazuje pravnega interesa za ponavljanje na vsebinsko identično trditveno podlago oprtega predloga, je Vrhovno sodišče njen ponovni predlog za prenos pristojnosti zavrglo.