Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS sklep III DoR 112/2014 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2014:III.DOR.112.2014 AI generated

Supreme Court allows appeal regarding employer's liability for work injury damages under Work Injury Act Article 87.

Case Number VSRS sklep III DoR 112/2014
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia permitted the appeal regarding whether a sole proprietor must compensate the Health Insurance Institution for damages arising from a work accident. The first-instance court ordered payment to the plaintiff, but the second-instance court overturned this, dismissing the claim against the sole proprietor. The court granted the appeal because the conditions for revision under the Code of Civil Procedure were met, allowing the case to proceed on this specific legal question.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 87 of the Work Injury Act; Article 367.a(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure: The Supreme Court may permit an appeal when the lower court's decision on a specific legal issue is contested, ensuring uniform application of the Work Injury Act regarding employer liability.

Keywords

AI generated
Work Injury Act sole proprietor liability work accident compensation Health Insurance Institution revision of appeal Code of Civil Procedure employer duty

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 87 of the Work Injury Act
Article 367.a(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure
AI generated
Sklep III DoR 17/2013
Supreme Court allows appeal on whether explicit work confirmation is needed under Civil Code Art. 642(3).
VSRS Sodba III Ips 34/2020
Supreme Court dismisses claim for damages by finding no causal link between bond purchase and subsequent devaluation.
Sklep II DoR 548/2010
Supreme Court allows review to determine if victim's contribution reduces the statutory subrogation limit in traffic accident compensation.
VDSS Sklep Psp 17/2017
Appeal allowed; defendant absent abroad prevented fair trial due to improper service of process.
VSRS sklep II Ips 137/2014
Supreme Court allows appeal, revoking lower court's dismissal of interim injunction against asset dissipation.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je po določbi 87. člena ZZVZZ samostojni podjetnik dolžan Zavodu za zdravstveno zavarovanje Slovenije povrniti škodo, ki je temu nastala, ker se je samostojni podjetnik poškodoval v delovni nezgodi in ni izvedel ustreznih higiensko-sanitarnih ukrepov, ukrepov varstva pri delu ali drugih ukrepov, predpisanih ali odrejenih za varnost ljudi.

[JEDRO]

Predlog se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je po določbi 87. člena ZZVZZ samostojni podjetnik dolžan Zavodu za zdravstveno zavarovanje Slovenije povrniti škodo, ki je temu nastala, ker se je samostojni podjetnik poškodoval v delovni nezgodi in ni izvedel ustreznih higiensko-sanitarnih ukrepov, ukrepov varstva pri delu ali drugih ukrepov, predpisanih ali odrejenih za varnost ljudi.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je v delu, relevantnem za odločitev o predlogu za dopustitev revizije, razsodilo, da je tretjetoženec dolžan tožeči stranki v 15 dneh plačati 25.301,00 EUR z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi od 15. 5. 2012 do plačila.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbi tožeče stranke zoper navedeni del izreka sodbe sodišča prve stopnje ugodilo in sodbo sodišča prve stopnje spremenilo tako, da je tožbeni zahtevek zoper tretjetoženca zavrnilo.

3. Vrhovno sodišče je ugotovilo, da glede vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku tega sklepa, obstajajo pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku, zato je revizijo glede tega vprašanja dopustilo.