Legislator Case Law & Legislation
VSRS sklep II DoR 282/2013 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2013:II.DOR.282.2013 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal request as withdrawn due to failure to pay court fees within deadline.

Case Number VSRS sklep II DoR 282/2013
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia dismissed the applicant's request for permission to appeal because the applicant failed to pay the required court fee within the stipulated deadline. The applicant had lodged an appeal against a second-instance judgment regarding a debt of €26,375.29 but neglected to settle the court fee after being summoned by a payment order. Consequently, the court ruled that the appeal request was deemed withdrawn in accordance with the third paragraph of Article 105 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 105 of the Code of Civil Procedure; failure to pay court fees within the deadline results in the deemed withdrawal of the appeal request.

Keywords

AI generated
deemed withdrawal court fees payment order appeal permission Code of Civil Procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 105 of the Code of Civil Procedure
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se, da je predlog umaknjen.

[JEDRO]

Predlagatelj takse pa v danem roku po prejemu plačilnega naloga ni plačal. V skladu s tretjim odstavkom 105. člena ZPP se zato šteje, da je predlog za dopustitev revizije umaknil.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Tožeča stranka je vložila predlog za dopustitev revizije zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje v zvezi s sodbo sodišča prve stopnje v delu, ki se nanaša na plačilo zneska 26.375,29 EUR.

2. Ker ob vložitvi predloga za dopustitev revizije ni bila plačana sodna taksa, je Vrhovno sodišče pozvalo tožečo stranko na plačilo takse s plačilnim nalogom, s katerim ji je določilo rok za plačilo in jo opozorilo na posledice neplačila (prvi in drugi odstavek 105.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku, v nadaljevanju ZPP).

3. Tožeča stranka je po svojem pooblaščencu plačilni nalog prejela 2. 9. 2013, takse pa v danem roku ni plačala. V skladu s tretjim odstavkom 105. člena ZPP se zato šteje, da je predlog umaknila.