Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep I R 35/2014 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2014:I.R.35.2014 AI generated

Supreme Court transfers civil case to Trbovlje District Court for economic efficiency due to plaintiff's residence.

Case Number Sklep I R 35/2014
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia transferred the case to the District Court in Trbovlje based on the defendant's proposal. The plaintiff resides in Trbovlje, where the defendant's local unit and authorized representative are also located, making the distance to the Ljubljana court significantly longer. The court ruled that transferring the proceedings to the nearest location for all parties is rational and ensures a more efficient judicial process.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 67 of the Act on Civil Procedure; A court may transfer a case to another competent court upon party request if it is evident that the proceedings would be conducted more easily, prioritizing economic efficiency and proximity to the parties' residences.

Keywords

AI generated
civil procedure court jurisdiction economic efficiency procedural transfer party residence district court supreme court

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 67 of the Act on Civil Procedure
AI generated
VSRS sklep I R 107/2013
Supreme Court transfers jurisdiction to Trbovlje court based on economic efficiency and proximity of parties' residences.
Sklep I R 63/2012
Supreme Court transfers jurisdiction to Trbovlje based on economic efficiency and proximity of parties' locations.
Sklep I R 57/2013
Supreme Court transfers payment claim trial to Maribor court based on witness location and cost efficiency.
Sklep I R 112/2007
Employment at another court within the same judicial district does not justify a transfer request under ZPP Art. 67.
VSRS Sklep I R 115/2015
Appeal court transfers enforcement case to another district court due to appearance of bias from daughter of debtor working as court assistant.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Za sojenje se določi pristojnost Okrajnega sodišča v Trbovljah.

[JEDRO]

Z vidika ekonomičnosti je nedvomno racionalnejše, da sodni postopek poteka v kraju, ki je najbližji prebivališču (sedežu) udeležencev postopka.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Toženka je v odgovoru na tožbo predlagala, da se zaradi ekonomičnosti postopka zadevo prenese v obravnavo pred stvarno pristojno Okrajno sodišče v Trbovljah. Tožnik ima namreč na območju tega sodišča stalno prebivališče, tam pa je tudi sedež območne enote toženke in pisarna njene pooblaščenke. Tožnikova pooblaščenka je iz Celja, njena pot do Trbovelj pa je za 6o km krajša, kot če bi se vozila na pristojno sodišče v Ljubljani.

2. Predlog je utemeljen.

3. Vrhovno sodišče lahko tudi na predlog stranke določi drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče, da postopa v zadevi, če je očitno, da se bo tako laže opravil postopek(1). Z vidika ekonomičnosti je nedvomno racionalnejše, da sodni postopek poteka v kraju, ki je najbližji prebivališču (sedežu) udeležencev postopka. Zato je Vrhovno sodišče določilo pristojnost trboveljskega okrajnega sodišča.

---.---

Op. št. (1): Primerjaj določbo 67. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku - ZPP.