Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep III DoR 52/2014 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2014:III.DOR.52.2014 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal request in personal bankruptcy proceedings as revision is legally prohibited.

Case Number Sklep III DoR 52/2014
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the creditor's request to allow a revision appeal against the appellate court's dismissal of their objection to the bankruptcy initiation. The creditor argued for further review, but the court ruled that the Law on Financial Operations and Insolvency Proceedings explicitly forbids filing a revision in personal bankruptcy cases. Consequently, the request was dismissed, and the creditor bears the associated costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

ZFPPIPP 121(2); ZPP 367(4): In proceedings for personal bankruptcy, a revision appeal is legally inadmissible, and the appellate court must reject any request to permit such an appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
personal bankruptcy proceedings revision appeal inadmissibility insolvency law restrictions creditor appeal rights costs allocation rules

Cited Legislation

AI generated
ZFPPIPP 121(2)
ZPP 367(4)
ZPP 154(1)
ZPP 165(1)
ZFPPIPP 121(1)
AI generated
VSL sklep Cst 457/2015
Court allows debt discharge objection due to disproportionate obligations relative to debtor's assets.
VSL Sklep Cst 334/2022
Appeal granted; court held mandatory hearing violated due process when debtor was hospitalized unexpectedly.
VSL Sklep Cst 127/2020
Court dismisses debt relief appeal, ruling excessive rapid debt accumulation violates good debtor standard.
VSL sklep Cst 171/2015
Bankruptcy appeal allowed; first instance court dismissed timely objection and failed to address creditor's evidence on director's liability.
VSL sklep Cst 88/2012
Appeal dismissed; director liable for new debt despite knowing old debt due to insolvency law.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrže.

Upnik sam krije stroške predloga.

[JEDRO]

V postopku osebnega stečaja sodišče revizije ne more dopustiti.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče druge stopnje je v postopku osebnega stečaja s sklepom zavrglo pritožbo upnika zoper sklep sodišča prve stopnje, s katerim je bil ugovor upnika zoper sklep o začetku postopka odpusta obveznosti zavrnjen.

2. Upnik je zoper sklep sodišča druge stopnje vložil predlog za dopustitev revizije.

3. Revizije ni mogoče dopustiti.

4. Zakon o finančnem poslovanju, postopkih zaradi insolventnosti in prisilnem prenehanju (v nadaljevanju ZFPPIPP) v drugem odstavku 121. člena v zvezi s 5. členom določa, da v postopku zaradi insolventnosti ni mogoče vložiti revizije. Ker revizija v postopku osebnega stečaja tako ni dovoljena, je sodišče ne more dopustiti (četrti odstavek 367. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku - v nadaljevanju ZPP v zvezi s prvim in drugim odstavkom 121. člena ZFPPIPP). Vrhovno sodišče je zato odločilo tako, kot izhaja iz I. točke izreka tega sklepa.

5. Odločitev o stroških temelji na prvem odstavku 154. člena ZPP v zvezi s prvim odstavkom 165. člena ZPP v zvezi s prvim odstavkom 121. člena ZFPPIPP (II. točka izreka sklepa).