Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep III DoR 58/2014 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2014:III.DOR.58.2014 AI generated

Court allows appeal on whether budget law or commercial tenancy law governs indefinite lease termination.

Case Number Sklep III DoR 58/2014
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court granted the applicant's request to permit an appeal regarding a specific legal question. The tenant challenged the lower court's confirmation of a landlord's termination of an indefinite-term lease, arguing whether the Budget Execution Act or the Commercial Tenancy Act applied. The court decided to allow the appeal because the first instance court had not resolved the applicable legal basis for the termination.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku, 367.a odst. 1; An appeal is permitted when the first instance court fails to rule on a legal question concerning the applicability of the Budget Execution Act versus the Commercial Tenancy Act regarding the termination of an indefinite-term lease.

Keywords

AI generated
indefinite term lease termination validity Budget Execution Act Commercial Tenancy Act appeal permission legal question lower court error

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Zakon o pravdnem postopku, 367.a odst. 1
AI generated
VSRS Sklep III DoR 42/2019-10
Supreme Court allows appeal regarding contractor quantity and quality requirements under contract law.
VSL sodba II Cp 1638/99
Civil court dismissed appeal; criminal conviction bars civil liability for abuse of legal entity.
VSRS Sklep VIII DoR 228/2022-6
Supreme Court allows review on whether severance pay for short-time workers uses actual or full-time equivalent average salary.
VSL sodba I Cpg 1559/2012
Appeal dismissed; failure to pay debt via joint debt declaration constitutes admission of liability.
VSL sodba I Cpg 1116/2012
Appeal dismissed; plaintiff failed to prove economic total loss and neglected material procedural leadership duties.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlogu se ugodi in se revizija dopusti glede vprašanja:

Ali za veljavno odpoved najemne pogodbe, sklenjene za nedoločen čas, pridejo v poštev določbe Zakona o izvrševanju proračuna RS za leto 2006 in 2007 (ZIPRS0607) ali določbe Zakona o poslovnih stavbah in poslovnih prostorih (ZPSPP)?

[JEDRO]

Dopuščena revizija:

- ali za veljavno odpoved najemne pogodbe, sklenjene za nedoločen čas, pridejo v poštev določbe ZIPRS0607 ali določbe ZPSPP?

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je v delu, relevantnem za presojo predloga, ohranilo v veljavi sklep o izvršbi, na podlagi katerega je tožena stranka dolžna tožeči stranki plačati 13.460,88 EUR z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi. Sodišče druge stopnje je prvostopenjsko sodbo potrdilo.

2. Zoper del sodbe sodišča druge stopnje, s katerim ni uspela, vlaga tožena stranka predlog za dopustitev revizije.

3. Revizijsko sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku glede pravnega vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku sklepa. Revizijo je zato v tem obsegu dopustilo.