Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep III DoR 30/2014 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2014:III.DOR.30.2014 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal admissibility request due to non-fulfillment of ZPP Article 367.a conditions.

Case Number Sklep III DoR 30/2014
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicant's request to permit an appeal against the second-instance court's judgment. The first-instance court invalidated a land registry entry for one-third of a property and ordered its re-entry in the applicant's favor, while rejecting the primary claim for payment of 13,605.22 EUR plus interest. The second-instance court dismissed the appeal regarding the payment claim but rejected the appeal concerning the land registry correction. The Supreme Court denied the admissibility request because the applicant failed to meet the specific conditions outlined in Article 367.a of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367.a of the Code of Civil Procedure; An appeal admissibility request is inadmissible if the applicant fails to demonstrate that the first-instance judgment violates a provision of law or contains a manifestly erroneous assessment of facts.

Keywords

AI generated
appeal admissibility Code of Civil Procedure land registry entry property ownership manifestly erroneous assessment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367.a of the Code of Civil Procedure
AI generated
VSRS Sklep II DoR 399/2021
Supreme Court dismisses review application as Civil Procedure Act conditions for review are not met.
VSL sodba in sklep II Cp 3161/2014
Appeal partially allowed; court voids contracts by dissolved company but rejects claims against it as non-existent entity.
VSL sodba I Cpg 1099/2013
Appeal partially allowed; court ruled tax request for land registry permit invalid as ownership acquisition is originative.
VSL Sodba II Cp 749/2020
Appeal court reverses first instance ruling, dismissing plaintiff's claim for ownership based on adverse possession and contract ratification.
VSRS Sklep III DoR 126/2016-6
Appeal allowed regarding premature deletion request when property registration for defendant remains incomplete.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Ker niso izpolnjeni pogoji, ki jih za dopustitev revizije določa 367.a člen ZPP, je Vrhovno sodišče predlog tožeče stranke za dopustitev revizije zavrnilo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je razsodilo, da se razveljavi učinek zemljiškoknjižnega dovolila iz prodajne pogodbe (do 1/35), in ugodilo podrejenemu zahtevku za izbris lastninske pravice tožene stranke (do 1/35) in ponoven vpis v korist tožeče stranke, medtem ko je primarni zahtevek za plačilo 13.605,22 EUR z zamudnimi obrestmi zavrnilo. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo tožeče stranke zoper odločitev o primarnem zahtevku zavrnilo, zoper odločitev o podrejenem zahtevku pa zavrglo.

2. Tožeča stranka je zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje vložila predlog za dopustitev revizije.

3. Ker niso izpolnjeni pogoji, ki jih za dopustitev revizije določa 367.a člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP), je Vrhovno sodišče predlog tožeče stranke za dopustitev revizije zavrnilo.