Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep III DoR 43/2014 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2014:III.DOR.43.2014 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed review application as statutory conditions under ZPP were not met.

Case Number Sklep III DoR 43/2014
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicant's request to permit a review of the second-instance judgment. The lower courts had ruled that the defendant must deliver a truck or pay 18,900 EUR plus interest. The Supreme Court found that the conditions for allowing a review under Article 367.a of the Code of Civil Procedure were not satisfied.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367.a of the Code of Civil Procedure; A review application is inadmissible if the statutory conditions for its permission are not met.

Keywords

AI generated
review application Code of Civil Procedure permission conditions second instance dismissal of request

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367.a of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPP)
AI generated
VSL Sodba I Cpg 672/2019
Appeal dismissed; default judgment on railway track placement cannot be challenged via factual error claims.
Sklep II Ips 670/2006
Supreme Court allows appeal, voiding judgment due to judge's disqualification from affinity relationship.
VSL sodba II Cp 890/99
Tenant's appeal dismissed; forced sale price protects against damages for breach of contract.
Sklep II Ips 715/94
Appeal court quashes appeal decision due to procedural error regarding service of judgment to general power of attorney holder.
VSL sodba II Cp 499/99
Court allows tort claim for pain and suffering even if victim refuses disability pension claim.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Ker niso izpolnjeni pogoji, ki jih za dopustitev revizije določa 367.a člen ZPP, je Vrhovno sodišče predlog tožeče stranke za dopustitev revizije zavrnilo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je razsodilo, da je tožena stranka dolžna izročiti tožeči stranki drugo tovorno vozilo ali pa ji plačati znesek 18.900,00 EUR z zamudnimi obrestmi in prevzeti sporno vozilo. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo tožene stranke zavrnilo in sodbo sodišča prve stopnje potrdilo.

2. Tožena stranka je zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje vložila predlog za dopustitev revizije.

3. Ker niso izpolnjeni pogoji, ki jih za dopustitev revizije določa 367.a člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP), je Vrhovno sodišče predlog tožene stranke za dopustitev revizije zavrnilo.