Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep III DoR 18/2014 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2014:III.DOR.18.2014 AI generated

Supreme Court allows appeal regarding whether the concession contract termination was lawful.

Case Number Sklep III DoR 18/2014
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court granted the appeal request specifically concerning the legality of the concession contract termination. The first-instance court had rejected the claim that the termination was unlawful, while the second-instance court reversed this and found the contract valid. Consequently, the Supreme Court permitted the appeal to proceed solely on the question of whether the termination complied with legal requirements.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku, 367.a odst. 1: The Supreme Court may permit an appeal when a specific legal question regarding the validity of a contract termination is raised, provided the lower court's decision on that question is contested.

Keywords

AI generated
concession contract termination lawfulness of termination appeal permission contract validity second instance court supreme court review legal requirements

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Zakon o pravdnem postopku, 367.a odst. 1
AI generated
VSRS sodba III Ips 64/2014
Supreme Court allows revocation of concession contract termination by licensor under indefinite term contract law.
VSL Sodba I Cpg 555/2019
Appeal court allows contract rescission claim for fixed-term contract where performance was clearly impossible within the agreed period.
VSK Sodba Cpg 24/2021
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first instance ruling on lost profit calculation and accounting rules under ZGJS.
Sklep I Up 560/2008
Appeal dismissed; temporary order denied due to lack of irreparable harm under ZUS-1 Art. 32(2).
VSL sodba in sklep I Cpg 926/2012
Appeal court allows pharmacy contract claim, ruling termination requires administrative revocation of license.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlogu se ugodi in se revizija dopusti glede vprašanja:

Ali je tožena stranka zakonito odpovedala koncesijsko pogodbo, sklenjeno s tožečo stranko?

[JEDRO]

Dopuščena revizija glede vprašanja ali je tožena stranka zakonito odpovedala koncesijsko pogodbo, sklenjeno s tožečo stranko.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je zavrnilo tožbeni zahtevek za ugotovitev, da je odpoved koncesijske pogodbe nezakonita in kot taka nima pravnega učinka ter da pogodba o koncesiji, sklenjena med pravdnima strankama, velja.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je prvostopenjsko sodbo spremenilo in tožbo zavrglo v delu, ki se nanaša na ugotovitev nezakonitosti odpovedi pogodbe, ter ugodilo zahtevku za ugotovitev veljavnosti koncesijske pogodbe.

3. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje vlaga tožena stranka predlog za dopustitev revizije.

4. Revizijsko sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367. a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku glede pravnega vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku sklepa. Revizijo je zato v tem obsegu dopustilo. V tem vprašanju so smiselno zajeta že vsa ostala zastavljena vprašanja, zato bo na njih odgovorjeno z odgovorom na dopuščeno vprašanje.