Supreme Court dismisses review request in border route case as review is not allowed in non-contentious proceedings.
Slovenia (SI)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicant's request to allow a review against a lower court's decision on a border route. The applicant argued for a review, but the court noted that Article 34 of the Non-Contentious Procedure Act generally prohibits reviews in such proceedings. Since the specific chapter governing border route approvals does not provide an exception, the review was deemed inadmissible and the request was dismissed.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArticle 34 of the Non-Contentious Procedure Act; In non-contentious proceedings for approval of a border route, a review is not permitted unless the law stipulates otherwise.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Predlog se zavrže.
[JEDRO]
V nepravdnem postopku za dovolitev mejne poti revizija ni dovoljena in je zato tudi ni mogoče dopustiti.
[OBRAZLOŽITEV]
1. Predlagatelj je vložil predlog za dopustitev revizije zoper sklep višjega sodišča, izdan v nepravdnem postopku za določitev nujne poti.
2. Predlog ni dovoljen.
3. V nepravdnem postopku revizija ni dovoljena, razen če zakon določa drugače (34. člen Zakona o nepravdnem postopku). Ker zakon v poglavju, v katerem ureja postopek za dovolitev nujne poti, ne določa drugače, revizija ni dovoljena in je zato tudi ni mogoče dopustiti.
4. Predlagateljev predlog je zato Vrhovno sodišče zavrglo.