Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep III DoR 91/2013 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2014:III.DOR.91.2013 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal permission request as statutory conditions under ZPP Art. 367.a are not met.

Case Number Sklep III DoR 91/2013
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia rejected the defendant's request to permit an appeal. The defendant sought to annul the annual report and board resolutions regarding profit distribution, while the first-instance court had only granted relief for the profit distribution resolution. The Supreme Court denied the appeal permission because the specific conditions required by Article 367.a of the Code of Civil Procedure were not satisfied.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367.a of the Code of Civil Procedure; An appeal permission request is inadmissible if the statutory conditions for granting such permission are not met.

Keywords

AI generated
appeal permission request Code of Civil Procedure annulment of corporate resolutions annual report nullity profit distribution resolution

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367.a of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPP)
AI generated
VSRS Sodba in sklep III Ips 35/2017
Slovenian Supreme Court partially allows appeal, upholding nullity of 2013 annual report regarding executive and supervisory board remuneration.
VSK sodba Cpg 78/2008
Court allows appeal against lower court ruling that rejected shareholder request to distribute retained earnings in Slovenian LLC case.
VSL Sklep I Cpg 594/2023
Appeal allowed; court held lower court erred by separately valuing subsidiary claims instead of applying the one-third tax rule.
VSL sodba in sklep I Cpg 1094/2009
Court partially allows shareholder suit to annul board resolutions violating corporate essence and invalid share transfer restrictions.
VSK Sodba Cpg 268/2016
Court dismisses appeal against partial annulment of annual report regarding executive compensation disclosure. Appeal rejected for procedural violations and legal errors in accounting. Court upholds first-instance ruling on report validity.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Ker niso izpolnjeni pogoji, ki jih za dopustitev revizije določa 367.a člen ZPP, je Vrhovno sodišče predlog tožene stranke za dopustitev revizije zavrnilo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Tožnici sta primarno uveljavljali ničnost letnega poročila tožene stranke za leto 2009 in ničnost sklepov skupščine tožene stranke z dne 30. 8. 2010 o sprejemu tega letnega poročila, o uporabi bilančnega dobička in podelitvi razrešnice direktorju. Podrejeno sta zahtevali razveljavitev navedenih sklepov skupščine tožene stranke. Sodišče prve stopnje je ugodilo le tožbenemu zahtevku za razveljavitev sklepa o uporabi bilančnega dobička. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo tožene stranke zavrnilo in potrdilo izpodbijani ugodilni del sodbe sodišča prve stopnje.

2. Tožena stranka je zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje vložila predlog za dopustitev revizije.

3. Ker niso izpolnjeni pogoji, ki jih za dopustitev revizije določa 367.a člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP), je Vrhovno sodišče predlog tožene stranke za dopustitev revizije zavrnilo.