Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep III DoR 124/2013 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2014:III.DOR.124.2013 AI generated

Appeal allowed regarding whether a pre-litigation security order created a separation right under ZFPPIPP when bankruptcy started before approval.

Case Number Sklep III DoR 124/2013
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia granted the appeal request to permit a review of the lower court's decision. The appellant challenged a final judgment that rejected claims for repayment of funds and interest paid to the defendant. The court allowed the review specifically to determine if a pre-litigation security order established a separation right under Article 19 of the Enforcement and Execution Act when bankruptcy proceedings commenced prior to the order's approval.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 19 of the Enforcement and Execution Act; A pre-litigation security order may establish a separation right if bankruptcy proceedings are initiated against the debtor before the order is approved.

Keywords

AI generated
separation right pre-litigation security bankruptcy proceedings enforcement act appeal permission

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 19 of the Enforcement and Execution Act
Article 264, paragraph 2 of the Insolvency Act
Article 367.a, paragraph 1 of the Act on Civil Procedure
AI generated
VDSS sodba Pdp 295/2016
Appeal dismissed; employer not liable for driver license costs incurred before workplace accident.
VSL Sodba I Cpg 687/2017
Appeal dismissed; simultaneous performance bars bankruptcy set-aside under Slovenian insolvency law.
VSM Sodba I Cp 110/2025
Unjust enrichment claim dismissed because plaintiff still used the property, preventing benefit transfer to defendant.
VDSS Sodba in sklep Pdp 4/2019
Appeal partially allowed: Court reduced employer's litigation costs to 747.19 EUR after correcting legal error on partial admission.
VSL sodba II Cp 3937/2008
Veteran's claim for arrears interest dismissed; must be raised in administrative or compensation proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlogu se ugodi in se revizija dopusti glede vprašanja:

Ali je sklep o zavarovanju s predhodno odredbo v korist upnika ustanavljal ločitveno pravico v smislu 19. člena ZFPPIPP v primeru, da je bil pred opravičitvijo predhodne odredbe v smislu drugega odstavka 264. člena ZIZ nad dolžnikom začet stečajni postopek?

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja:

Ali je sklep o zavarovanju s predhodno odredbo v korist upnika ustanavljal ločitveno pravico v smislu 19. člena ZFPPIPP v primeru, da je bil pred opravičitvijo predhodne odredbe v smislu drugega odstavka 264. člena ZIZ nad dolžnikom začet stečajni postopek?

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče druge stopnje je pravnomočno zavrnilo tožbeni zahtevek za razveljavitev učinka plačila denarnega zneska v korist tožene stranke ter za plačilo 143.650,92 EUR z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi.

2. Zoper odločitev sodišča druge stopnje vlaga tožeča stranka predlog za dopustitev revizije. Revizijsko sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku glede pravnega vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku sklepa. Revizijo je zato v tem obsegu dopustilo.