Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep III DoR 95/2013 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2014:III.DOR.95.2013 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed review request as conditions of Article 367a ZPP were not met.

Case Number Sklep III DoR 95/2013
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia rejected the applicant's request for permission to file a review. The applicant sought a reduction in purchase price and damages, but the first and second instance courts denied these claims. The review request was dismissed because the statutory conditions outlined in Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act were not satisfied.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act; A review request is inadmissible if the conditions for granting permission under this provision are not met.

Keywords

AI generated
review request permission conditions Civil Procedure Act dismissed application second instance court

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act
AI generated
VSRS Sodba II Ips 103/2017
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; wife not liable for husband's loan as it wasn't for family needs.
VDSS sodba Pdp 1054/2011
Employer's claim dismissed; manager not liable for inventory loss under objective liability without proven intent or gross negligence.
Sodba II Ips 931/2008
Supreme Court dismisses appeal claiming expert negligence due to client's failure to provide missing documentation.
VSL sklep II Cp 2363/2013
Appeal allowed; court quashes first instance judgment on business association property costs due to jurisdictional error.
VSK sodba I Cp 589/2005
Appeal dismissed; procedural errors do not equal illegal conduct if disciplinary process followed statutory rules.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Ker niso izpolnjeni pogoji, ki jih za dopustitev revizije določa 367.a člen ZPP, je Vrhovno sodišče predlog tožeče stranke zavrnilo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je zavrnilo tožbeni zahtevek tožeče stranke za znižanje kupnine in plačilo škode v znesku 65.713,23 EUR z zamudnimi obrestmi. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo tožeče stranke zavrnilo in potrdilo sodbo sodišča prve stopnje.

2. Tožeča stranka je zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje vložila predlog za dopustitev revizije.

3. Ker niso izpolnjeni pogoji, ki jih za dopustitev revizije določa 367.a člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP), je Vrhovno sodišče predlog tožeče stranke zavrnilo.