Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL sklep I Cp 354/2013 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2013:I.CP.354.2013 AI generated

Court dismisses appeal withdrawal case where plaintiff withdrew appeal before second instance judgment. Appeal withdrawn by plaintiff before judgment; costs borne by defendant as no response was needed.

Case Number VSL sklep I Cp 354/2013
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court found that the plaintiff withdrew their appeal before the second instance court issued a decision. Although the defendant responded to the appeal, the court ruled that since the appeal was withdrawn, the response was unnecessary and did not contribute to the outcome. Consequently, the plaintiff's withdrawal was accepted, and the defendant bears the costs of the appeal proceedings alone.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku (ZPP), drugi odstavek 334. člena; drugi odstavek 158. člena; prvi odstavek 155. člena: A party may withdraw an appeal before the second instance court renders a judgment, and the opposing party bears the costs of the appeal proceedings if the response was not necessary for the decision.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of appeal second instance proceedings costs of appeal ZPP appeal withdrawal unanswered appeal response

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Zakon o pravdnem postopku (ZPP), drugi odstavek 334. člena
Zakon o pravdnem postopku (ZPP), drugi odstavek 158. člena
Zakon o pravdnem postopku (ZPP), prvi odstavek 155. člena
AI generated
VSL Sklep II Cp 1288/2018
Court partially allows appeal to increase legal costs by rejecting unnecessary filing fees but awarding VAT and additional filing fees.
VDSS Sodba Pdp 354/2017
Appeal partially allowed: employer's mobing claim dismissed; litigation costs reduced due to partial success.
VSL Sodba II Cp 1825/2020
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first instance judgment on loan debt and evidence admissibility.
VSL sodba II Cp 296/2011
Appeal dismissed; court ruling upheld as delay not unreasonable despite procedural issues and lack of fault.
VSL Vmesna sodba in sklep I Cpg 513/2020
Employer and employee share liability 40/60 for workplace injury due to both parties' negligence.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I. Ugotovi se, da je tožnik umaknil pritožbo.

II. Prvi toženec sam nosi svoje stroške pritožbenega postopka.

[JEDRO]

Dokler pritožbeno sodišče ne izda odločbe, lahko stranka umakne že vloženo pritožbo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je z izpodbijano sodbo zavrnilo tožbeni zahtevek in tožniku naložilo, da prvemu tožencu povrne njegove pravdne stroške v višini 1791,00 EUR.

2. Zoper sodbo je tožnik vložil pritožbo, ki pa jo je z vlogo 11. 3. 2013 umaknil.

3. Dokler pritožbeno sodišče ne izda odločbe, lahko stranka umakne že vloženo pravno sredstvo (drugi odstavek 334. člena ZPP (1)). Ker o vloženi pritožbi pritožbeno sodišče še ni odločalo, je bilo treba upoštevati izjavo tožnika o umiku pritožbe.

4. Prvi toženec je odgovoril na pritožbo. Stranka, ki umakne pravno sredstvo, mora nasprotni stranki povrniti stroške, nastale zaradi pravnega sredstva (drugi odstavek 158. člena ZPP), vendar le tiste stroške, ki so bili potrebni za postopek (prvi odstavek 155. člena ZPP). Odgovor na pritožbo ne bi prispeval k odločanju o pritožbi v primeru, da pritožba ne bi bila umaknjena, zato stroški odgovora niso potrebni in jih krije prvi toženec sam.

(1) Zakon o pravdnem postopku (Ur. l. RS, št. 73/2007 in nasl.)