Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep III DoR 101/2013 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2014:III.DOR.101.2013 AI generated

Supreme Court allows review on whether liability insurance covers long-term activity damage under agreed terms.

Case Number Sklep III DoR 101/2013
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court granted the applicant's request to permit a review of the legal issue regarding liability insurance coverage. The lower court upheld a judgment awarding damages for harm caused by the insured's prolonged activity, even though no sudden accident occurred. The court decided to allow the review because the specific legal question concerning coverage under the agreed general terms for liability insurance was deemed suitable for appellate examination.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku 367.a odst. 1: The Supreme Court may permit a review of a legal issue if the lower court's decision is based on a violation of law or if the issue is of significant legal importance.

Keywords

AI generated
liability insurance coverage long-term activity damage review of judgment agreed general terms sudden accident requirement ZPP 367.a supreme court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Zakon o pravdnem postopku 367.a odst. 1
AI generated
VSC sodba Cp 1429/2006
Civil appeal dismissed; plaintiff failed to prove wrongful conduct or lack of authority for land subsidy claim.
Sodba II Ips 544/2000
Slovenian Supreme Court partially allowed appeal to reduce non-material damage compensation for physical injury.
VSL sodba II Cp 4925/2006
Appeal court partially allows claim for interest and costs but rejects higher compensation demand in personal injury case.
VSL sodba II Cp 31/2008
Appeal court dismisses claim for damages for minor liquid spill on stairs, ruling it lacks objective danger.
VSL Sodba II Cp 193/2022
Appeal court dismisses claim for damages due to missed filing deadlines, ruling statute of limitations began when loss occurred. The court rejects the argument that the statute of limitations was interrupted by suing the insurance company instead of the direct tortfeasor. The claim is dismissed because the plaintiff failed to prove the statute of limitations was interrupted against the defendant.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlogu se ugodi in se revizija dopusti o pravnem vprašanju, ali je po dogovorjenih Splošnih pogojih za zavarovanje odgovornosti (PG-odg/99-12, PG-odg/04-12 in PG-odg/07-1) podano zavarovalno kritje za škodo, ki je posledica dalj časa trajajočega vplivanja dejavnosti zavarovanca, čeprav ne gre za nenaden in presenetljiv ter od pogodbene stranke neodvisen dogodek (nesrečo)?

[JEDRO]

Predlogu se ugodi in se revizija dopusti o pravnem vprašanju, ali je po dogovorjenih Splošnih pogojih za zavarovanje odgovornosti (PG-odg/99-12, PG-odg/04-12 in PG-odg/07-1) podano zavarovalno kritje za škodo, ki je posledica dalj časa trajajočega vplivanja dejavnosti zavarovanca, čeprav ne gre za nenaden in presenetljiv ter od pogodbene stranke neodvisen dogodek (nesrečo)?

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče druge stopnje je zavrnilo pritožbo tožene stranke in potrdilo izpodbijano vmesno sodbo sodišča prve stopnje, da je tožbeni zahtevek za plačilo odškodnine v znesku 30.691,36 EUR z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi od zneska 5.904,36 EUR od 31. 7. 2008 dalje in od zneska 24.787,00 EUR od 24. 6. 2011 dalje glede podlage utemeljen.

2. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje je vložila predlog za dopustitev revizije tožena stranka.

3. Revizijsko sodišče ugotavlja, da so pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (v nadaljevanju ZPP) izpolnjeni glede pravnega vprašanja, navedenega v izreku tega sklepa. Zato je predlogu ugodilo in revizijo o tem vprašanju dopustilo.