Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep III DoR 139/2013 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2014:III.DOR.139.2013 AI generated

Supreme Court allows review regarding when the 18-month moratorium period begins under the Guarantee Scheme Regulation.

Case Number Sklep III DoR 139/2013
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia permitted a review of the first-instance judgment regarding the start date of an 18-month moratorium period. The lower courts had dismissed the claim for contractual penalties based on a violation of Article 17, Paragraph 13 of the Guarantee Scheme Regulation. The court decided to allow the review because the specific question of when the moratorium commences meets the conditions for appeal under the Code of Civil Procedure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367a Paragraph 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure; Article 17 Paragraph 13 of the Regulation on the Implementation of the Guarantee Scheme of the Republic of Slovenia: A review is admissible when a specific legal question regarding the commencement of a statutory moratorium period is raised, even if the lower court dismissed the main claim.

Keywords

AI generated
Guarantee Scheme Regulation moratorium period commencement contractual penalty claim review admissibility Code of Civil Procedure Article 17 Paragraph 13 Supreme Court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367a Paragraph 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 17 Paragraph 13 of the Regulation on the Implementation of the Guarantee Scheme of the Republic of Slovenia
AI generated
VSRS sodba II Ips 187/2015
Contract law: No prior call to sign main contract required when counterparty clearly refused performance.
VSRS Sodba VIII Ips 18/2024
Supreme Court dismisses appeal, ruling contractual penalties for employee breach of notice period are impermissible under labor law.
VSL sodba I Cpg 1346/2003
Consumer credit appeal dismissed; court upheld first instance ruling on insurance coverage for purpose-based loans.
VDSS sodba Pdp 158/2016
Appeal dismissed; non-compete clause upheld as protecting essential client relationships in insurance brokerage.
VDSS sodba Pdp 1381/2010
Appeal dismissed: contractual penalty for illegal termination denied as employment contract continued via new offer acceptance.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, kdaj začne teči moratorij, za katerega Uredba o izvajanju ZJShemRS v 13. alineji 17. člena določa maksimalni rok 18 mesecev?

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, kdaj začne teči moratorij, za katerega Uredba o izvajanju ZJShemRS v 13. alineji 17. člena določa maksimalni rok 18 mesecev?

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je zavrnilo tožbeni zahtevek za plačilo pogodbene kazni v višini 5% odobrene in potrjene glavnice kredita, zavarovanega z jamstvom po Zakonu o jamstveni shemi Republike Slovenije (v nadaljevanju ZJShemRS) zaradi kršitve 13. alineje 17. člena Uredbe o izvajanju ZJShemRS.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo tožeče stranke zavrnilo in potrdilo izpodbijano sodbo.

3. Vrhovno sodišče je ugotovilo, da glede vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku tega sklepa, obstajajo pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku, zato je revizijo glede tega vprašanja dopustilo.