Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep III DoR 75/2013 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2013:III.DOR.75.2013 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal permission request as statutory conditions under ZPP Art. 367a were not met.

Case Number Sklep III DoR 75/2013
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia rejected the applicant's request to permit an appeal against the second-instance judgment. The applicant sought damages for lost profit due to a contract breach, but the lower courts upheld the dismissal of the claim. The Supreme Court denied permission for the appeal because the specific conditions outlined in Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure were not satisfied.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

367.a člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku; Permission for an appeal is granted only if the appeal raises a question of law of general importance or if the judgment is manifestly erroneous, and the Supreme Court dismissed the request as these statutory conditions were not met.

Keywords

AI generated
Code of Civil Procedure permission for appeal lost profit damages contract breach second instance judgment manifestly erroneous general importance

Cited Legislation

AI generated
367.a člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP)
Ker niso izpolnjeni pogoji, ki jih za dopustitev revizije določa 367.a člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP), je Vrhovno sodišče predlog tožeče stranke za dopustitev revizije zavrnilo.
AI generated
VSL sklep I Cpg 654/98
Appeal allowed; first-instance judgment voided for lack of reasoning on decisive facts violating procedural rules.
Sodba II Ips 913/2008
Claim for lost profit dismissed; plaintiff must prove business scope and income with probability exceeding 50%.
VSM sklep Cpg 215/97
Appeal allowed; counterclaim admissible under ZPP s. 189 despite potential set-off prohibition in transport terms.
VSL Sodba II Cpg 590/2019
Appeal dismissed; clear request for oral hearing required, not implied by evidence request.
Sklep III Ips 54/2010
Contract fixed term established by implied agreement; appeal granted due to incomplete fact-finding on penalty clauses.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Ker niso izpolnjeni pogoji, ki jih za dopustitev revizije določa 367.a člena ZPP, je Vrhovno sodišče predlog tožeče stranke za dopustitev revizije zavrnilo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je zavrnilo tožbeni zahtevek tožeče stranke za plačilo odškodnine (izgubljeni dobiček) zaradi kršitve pogodbe, na podlagi katere je opravljala prevoze za toženo stranko. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo tožeče stranke zavrnilo in potrdilo sodbo sodišča prve stopnje.

2. Tožeča stranka je zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje vložila predlog za dopustitev revizije.

3. Ker niso izpolnjeni pogoji, ki jih za dopustitev revizije določa 367.a člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP), je Vrhovno sodišče predlog tožeče stranke za dopustitev revizije zavrnilo.