Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep I Up 222/2009 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2009:I.UP.222.2009 AI generated

Supreme Court corrects a clerical error in a judgment regarding the applicant's country of origin from Pakistan to Palestine.

Case Number Sklep I Up 222/2009
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia issued a corrective ruling to fix a clear clerical error in its previous judgment where the applicant's country of origin was incorrectly stated as Pakistan. Evidence from the case files confirmed the correct country of origin was Palestine, necessitating the correction. The court exercised its authority under the Administrative Procedure Act to amend the error without allowing an appeal against this specific corrective decision.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) pr. 328. odst. 1; Zakon o upravnem sporu (ZUS-1) pr. 22.: A clear clerical error in a judgment regarding the applicant's country of origin may be corrected via a corrective ruling.

Keywords

AI generated
clerical error correction country of origin administrative procedure act corrective ruling judgment amendment Palestina Pakistan

Cited Legislation

AI generated
328. odst. 1 ZPP
22. ZUS-1
AI generated
VSK sklep Cp 972/2007
Appeal dismissed; maintenance allocation without agreement requires court order, not informal procedure.
VSRS Sklep Dsp 1/2021-7
Supreme Court corrects its own ruling by replacing the wrong party name with the correct appellant in the introduction.
Sklep I Up 366/2009
Supreme Court dismisses appeal for inadmissibility as only appeal is allowed against first-instance judgment in administrative proceedings.
VSC sklep Cpg 145/2007
Appeal dismissed because third party lacks standing to appeal an order rejecting their request to take over litigation.
VSL Sklep VI Cpg 138/2026
Appeal dismissed; late court fee payment treated as withdrawal under ZPP Art. 105a(2).

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

V uvodu in obrazložitvi sodbe Vrhovnega sodišča Republike Slovenije I Up 222/2009 z dne 18. junija 2009 se navedba države, iz katere prihaja tožeča stranka, popravi in se pravilno glasi: „Palestina“.

[JEDRO]

Očitna pomota o izvorni državi prosilca ZMZ v uvodu in obrazložitvi sodbe se lahko popravi s popravnim sklepom.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Vrhovno sodišče je v uvodu in obrazložitvi sodbe I Up 222/2009 dne 18. 6. 2009, s katero je odločilo o pritožbi tožeče stranke proti 1. točki sodbe in sklepa Upravnega sodišča Republike Slovenije v Ljubljani I U 642/2009 z dne 7. 5. 2009 navedlo kot tožnikovo izvorno državo „Pakistan“.

2. Iz listin, tako sodnega kot upravnega spisa izhaja, da je tožnikova izvorna država „Palestina“.

3. Gre za očitno pomoto v uvodu in obrazložitvi omenjene sodbe o navedbi tožnikove izvorne države (Pakistan namesto pravilno Palestina). Zato je Vrhovno sodišče navedeno pomoto popravilo s popravnim sklepom, za kar ima pooblastilo v določbah prvega odstavka 328. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku – ZPP, ki ga je glede na določbo 22. člena Zakona o upravnem sporu – ZUS-1 (Ur. l. RS, št. 105/2006) primerno uporabilo.

4. Pravni pouk: Zoper ta sklep ni pritožbe.