Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep VIII Ips 15/2009 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2010:VIII.IPS.15.2009 AI generated

Court dismisses appeal withdrawal case confirming parties may withdraw appeals before final judgment.

Case Number Sklep VIII Ips 15/2009
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia dismissed the appeal withdrawal case, confirming that a party may withdraw a lodged appeal before the court issues a decision on it. The appellant had filed an appeal against a second-instance labor court ruling, but subsequently submitted a request to withdraw the appeal on April 8, 2010. The court ruled that under the relevant procedural code, the withdrawal was valid because no final judgment had been rendered yet.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 383 of the Code of Civil Procedure; Article 2, Paragraph 2 of Article 334 of the Code of Civil Procedure: A party may withdraw a lodged appeal at any time before the court issues a decision on it.

Keywords

AI generated
appeal withdrawal civil procedure labor dispute supreme court procedural rights

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 383 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 2, Paragraph 2 of Article 334 of the Code of Civil Procedure
AI generated
VSRS Sklep VIII DoR 221/2023-8
Supreme Court allows review on mass dismissal procedure legality and timely notice of contract termination.
VDSS sodba Pdp 609/2008
Appeal dismissed; employer's dismissal within continuous notice period for repeated contract breaches upheld.
Sklep VIII Ips 53/2007
Court dismisses appeal withdrawal as valid since no decision was made on the appeal yet.
VDSS Sodba Pdp 645/2017
Appeal dismissed; reorganization not required for business reason dismissal legality.
VSRS Sodba in sklep VIII Ips 48/2019
Supreme Court allows appeal, ruling dismissal of pregnant worker's contract termination from business reasons unlawful.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se, da je tožena stranka umaknila revizijo.

[JEDRO]

Stranka lahko umakne vloženo revizijo, dokler sodišče o njej ne izda odločbe.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je ugodilo tožničinemu tožbenemu zahtevku za ugotovitev nezakonitosti redne odpovedi pogodbe o zaposlitvi tožene stranke iz poslovnega razloga z dne 4. 4. 2007 in reintegracijskemu zahtevku.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo tožene stranke glede odločitve o glavnem zahtevku zavrnilo, delno pa je spremenilo le izrek o stroških postopka.

3. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje je tožena stranka dne 20. 11. 2008 vložila revizijo. Dne 8. 4. 2010 pa je posredovala sodišču vlogo, s katero revizijo umika.

4. Na podlagi 383. člena in drugega odstavka 334. člena ZPP lahko stranka umakne že vloženo revizijo, dokler sodišče o njej ne izda odločbe. Zato je sodišče sklenilo, kot je navedeno v izreku.