Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
6595-24 AI generated

HFD allows exclusion from unemployment fund for intentional or grossly negligent false information.

Case Number 6595-24
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Sweden (SE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court granted permission to review a case regarding the exclusion of a member from an unemployment fund. The applicant argued that the exclusion was improper, while the fund contended the member provided false information through intent or gross negligence. The court determined that the statutory conditions for exclusion based on such conduct are met when the information significantly affects membership rights or benefits.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Lag (1982:71) om arbetslöshetskassor; 10 kap. 1 §: A member may be excluded from an unemployment fund if they intentionally or through gross negligence provided false information of significance regarding membership or benefits, unless special reasons exist to refrain from exclusion.

Keywords

AI generated
unemployment fund exclusion false information provision gross negligence standard membership rights impact special reasons requirement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Lag (1982:71) om arbetslöshetskassor
10 kap. 1 §
AI generated
4727-10
Unintentional false unemployment claims corrected before new application warrant exemption from expulsion rather than total exclusion.
5820-96
Unemployment insurance fund's appeal must go to the county court where the fund's board sits, not where the local office is.
594-13
HFD allows unemployment claim late submission due to administrative delay and reliance on pending court proceedings.
T 4028-05
Court partially allows claimant to avoid full repayment of unemployment benefits due to study participation.
2553-02
Unemployment benefits denied because late job center registration invalidated three-month return period under EU Regulation 1408/71.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

De frågor som har lett till att Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen meddelat prövningstillstånd gäller förutsättningarna för att besluta om uteslutning av en

medlem ur en arbetslöshetskassa på grund av att denne medvetet eller av grov vårdslöshet ska anses ha lämnat oriktiga eller vilseledande uppgifter om

förhållanden av betydelse för rätten till medlemskap eller ersättning och – för det fall förutsättningarna är uppfyllda – om det finns omständigheter som utgör

särskilda skäl för att underlåta uteslutning (Mål nr 6595-24, Kammarrätten i Stockholms mål nr 7045-23).