Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
M 13737-25 AI generated

Court grants dispensation for boat house and concrete slab but denies erosion protection and terrace.

Case Number M 13737-25
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Sweden (SE)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Mark- och miljööverdomstolen granted a dispensation for a boat house and its supporting concrete slab while denying requests for erosion protection and a terrace. The applicant successfully demonstrated that a boat house of identical placement and appearance existed prior to the enactment of shoreline protection regulations, thereby meeting the reduced evidentiary burden for historical circumstances. Consequently, the court allowed the dispensation for the structures essential to the boat house's location but rejected the separate applications for additional protective measures.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

s. 1 kap. 10 a § miljöbalken; s. 1 kap. 10 b § miljöbalken: A dispensation may be granted for structures existing prior to shoreline protection laws if the applicant proves their historical existence, but separate requests for erosion protection or terraces require independent justification and are not automatically included.

Keywords

AI generated
shoreline protection dispensation historical boat house reduced evidentiary burden erosion protection denial territorial terrace request

Cited Legislation

AI generated
s. 1 kap. 10 a § miljöbalken
s. 1 kap. 10 b § miljöbalken
AI generated
M 6222-14
Court grants coastal protection dispensation for building conversion due to established land use and lack of public access impact.
M 15014-25
Swedish court grants coastal protection dispensation for supplementary building due to prior approved use.
M 9274-05
Appeal dismissed; coastal protection dispensation denied due to lack of special reasons and public interest.
M 9580-24
Court dismissed appeal regarding lack of special reasons for coastal protection permit denial.
M 4191-24
Court dismisses beach protection dispensation appeal due to insufficient evidence of a pier at the time of protection. The applicant failed to prove the existence of a pier when the protection was established.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Strandskyddsdispens för båthus m.m. Sökanden har, med hänsyn till sänkt beviskrav för omständigheter som ligger långt tillbaka i tiden, på ett tillräckligt sätt visat att det funnits ett båthus med motsvarande placering och utseende som nuvarande båthus sedan innan strandskyddbestämmelserna trädde i kraft. Dispens har därför getts för båthuset samt för den betongplatta som båthuset står på och som pga. markförhållandena behövs för att båthuset ska vara kvar på platsen. Dispens har samtidigt nekats för ett erosionsskydd och en terrass.