Arbetsdomstolen allowed wage claim because defendant failed to respond to a court order.
Sweden (SE)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Arbitration Court of Sweden allowed the plaintiff's wage claim against the defendant company. The plaintiff argued that the defendant failed to respond to a court order to answer the case, which constituted a procedural violation. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, holding that the defendant's failure to comply with the order justified the award of the claimed wages.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArbetsdomstolans reg. 10 kap. 1 § ArbL; Arbetsdomstolans reg. 10 kap. 2 § ArbL: A failure by a respondent to answer a court order to respond to the case constitutes grounds for the court to allow the claimant's wage claim.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Svenska Transportarbetareförbundet
mot
Lea No 2 AB.
Målet gällde lönefordran m.m. Domen innebar att kärandens talan bifölls på grund av att svaranden underlåtit att följa ett föreläggande att avge svaromål.
Dom 2019-11-27, målnummer A-67-2019
Ledamot: Sören Öman
Rättssekreterare: Peter Edin