Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
A 117-21 AI generated

Union's claim dismissed because employer failed to respond to a formal notice to answer the dispute.

Case Number A 117-21
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Sweden (SE)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Swedish Arbitration Court dismissed the union's claim against the construction company for collective agreement violations. The union argued the employer breached the agreement by ignoring a formal notice to respond to the dispute. The court ruled that the employer's failure to provide a written response to the notice constituted the breach, but the specific claim regarding the violation was ultimately not upheld in the manner requested.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Arbetsdomstolens reg. 1 kap. 1 §; Arbetsdomstolens reg. 1 kap. 2 §: An employer's failure to respond to a formal notice to answer a dispute may constitute a breach of collective agreement obligations, though the specific remedy sought must align with the procedural requirements for such a claim.

Keywords

AI generated
collective agreement breach formal notice to answer employer response obligation Swedish Arbitration Court union dispute resolution

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Arbetsdomstolens reg. 1 kap. 1 §
Arbetsdomstolens reg. 1 kap. 2 §
AI generated
A 94-19
Union's claim dismissed because union representative was absent from court hearing proceedings.
A 182/24
Swedish Arbitration Court dismissed union claim for damages due to employer's failure to respond to a formal notice.
A 86-20
Arbetsdomstolen allowed the union's claim because the employer failed to respond to a formal notice.
A 91-18
Swedish union's claim against painter company dismissed due to company's absence at court hearing.
A 129/23
Union's claim dismissed because employer failed to respond to a formal inquiry notice within the required timeframe.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Svenska Byggnadsarbetareförbundet

mot

Bygg & Takservice i Helsingborg AB.

Målet gällde kollektivavtalsbrott m.m. Domen innebar att kärandens talan bifölls på grund av att svaranden underlåtit att följa ett föreläggande att avge svaromål.

Dom 2021-10-27, målnummer A-117-2021

Ledamot: Karin Renman

Rättssekreterare: Martina Sjölund