Legislator Case Law & Legislation
A 81-19 AI generated

Employment tribunal dismissed claimant's appeal for non-compliance with procedural response deadline requirements.

Case Number A 81-19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Sweden (SE)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Employment Court of Appeal dismissed the claimant's appeal against a labor court decision regarding dismissal. The claimant argued that the dismissal was unlawful, but the court found the appeal inadmissible because the claimant failed to submit a complete response to a formal directive within the prescribed time limit. Consequently, the appeal was rejected as procedurally defective, leaving the original dismissal decision standing.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Arbetsdomstolens reg. 10 kap. 1 §; Arbetsdomstolens reg. 10 kap. 2 §: Failure to comply with a directive to submit a complete response renders an appeal inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
employment appeal procedural deadline inadmissible appeal complete response formal directive dismissal case labor court

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Arbetsdomstolens reg. 10 kap. 1 §
Arbetsdomstolens reg. 10 kap. 2 §
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Svenska Målareförbundet

mot

A.R.G Takmåleri och Service AB i konkurs.

Målet gällde avskedande m.m. Domen innebar att kärandens talan bifölls på grund av att svaranden underlåtit att följa ett föreläggande att avge fullständigt svaromål.

Dom 2019-12-20, målnummer A-81-2019

Ledamot: Cathrine Lilja Hansson

Rättssekreterare: Pontus Bromander