Legislator Case Law & Legislation
A 149-23 AI generated

Arbetsdomstolen allowed the claim because the respondent failed to comply with a court order to answer.

Case Number A 149-23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Sweden (SE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Arbitration Court of Sweden allowed the plaintiff's claim against the defendant for refusing to participate in arbitration proceedings. The defendant had previously been ordered by the court to submit a response to the arbitration request but failed to comply with this directive. Consequently, the court ruled that the defendant's failure to answer constituted a valid ground for the plaintiff's claim to proceed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Arbetsdomstolens reg. 2018:100 § 1; Arbetsdomstolens reg. 2018:100 § 2: If a party fails to comply with a court order to submit a response to an arbitration request, the court may allow the opposing party's claim.

Keywords

AI generated
Arbitration refusal Court order compliance Procedural default Arbitration agreement Sweden arbitration law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Arbetsdomstolens reg. 2018:100 § 1
Arbetsdomstolens reg. 2018:100 § 2
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Nr 66

Stockholms Byggsyndikat - Solidariska Byggare

mot

R.J.K. med enskild firma BYGG-MEX.

Målet gällde förhandlingsvägran. Domen innebar att kärandens talan bifölls på grund av att svaranden underlåtit att följa ett föreläggande att avge svaromål.

Dom 2023-11-22, målnummer A-149-2023

Ledamot: Lars Dirke

Rättssekreterare: Pontus Bromander