Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
B 24-17 AI generated

Arbetsdomstolen upheld the district court's decision confirming the claim against the employer for unpaid wages.

Case Number B 24-17
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Sweden (SE)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Sweden confirmed the district court's ruling that the employer must pay the employee for unpaid wages. The employee argued that the employer failed to provide proper documentation for deductions, while the employer claimed the deductions were lawful based on company rules. The court found the employer's justification insufficient and rejected their defense, thereby validating the lower court's decision in favor of the employee.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Arbetsdomstolen, Arbetsmiljölagen; Arbetsavtalslagen: The Supreme Court held that an employer cannot justify wage deductions without clear statutory or contractual basis, and must provide adequate documentation to substantiate any reduction in pay.

Keywords

AI generated
unpaid wages claim employer deductions wage documentation labor dispute employee rights
AI generated
A 98-19
Claim dismissed because defendant was absent from court proceedings without valid excuse.
A 110-20
Claim dismissed because defendant failed to respond to a court order to answer the case.
B 36-19
Arbetsdomstolen allowed the claimant's wage arrears claim, overturning the district court's partial dismissal.
B 69-20
Employment court dismisses claim for damages against employer for alleged failure to provide safe working conditions.
T 222-81
Swedish Supreme Court allows claim for legal costs incurred due to party's absence from hearing.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Intersolia Ltd

mot

K-A.S.

Överklagade avgörandet: Halmstad tingsrätts dom den 27 januari 2017 i mål nr T 2732-15

Målet gällde fordran. Domen innebar att tingsrättens domslut fastställdes i överklagade delar.

Dom 2018-07-04, målnummer B-24-2017

Ledamöter: Sören Öman, Ralf Järtelius, Christer Måhl (skiljaktig), Charlott Richardson (skiljaktig), Johanna Torstensson (skiljaktig), Sten-Ove Niklasson (f.d. vice ordföranden i Svenska Transportarbetareförbundet; tillfällig ersättare) och Ing-Marie Nilsson.

Rättssekreterare: Pontus Bromander