Failure to provide inspection report does not justify reducing construction penalty fines.

The Mark- och miljööverdomstolen dismissed the appeal regarding a construction penalty fine imposed on a person who used an elevator without a valid inspection report. The appellant argued that the lack of access to the inspection protocol, which noted the elevator's unfitness for use, rendered the fine collection unfair and necessitated a reduction. The court rejected this claim, ruling that the procedural failure to share the report did not constitute a legal ground to lower the statutory penalty or deem the collection unjust.