Legislator Case Law & Legislation
A 84-19 AI generated

Arbetsdomstolen dismissed the claim for breach of negotiation duty due to lack of evidence regarding the employer's conduct.

Case Number A 84-19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Sweden (SE)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Arbitration Court of Sweden dismissed the plaintiff's claim alleging a breach of the duty to negotiate in good faith. The plaintiff argued that the employer failed to engage in meaningful discussions regarding collective bargaining terms. The court found no evidence supporting the allegation that the employer acted contrary to the duty to negotiate.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Arbetsdomstolens förordning (1995:100) kap. 1 § 1; Arbetsdomstolens förordning (1995:100) kap. 1 § 2: A claim for breach of the duty to negotiate in good faith is dismissed if the plaintiff fails to provide evidence demonstrating the employer's specific conduct violating the statutory obligation.

Keywords

AI generated
duty to negotiate good faith collective bargaining breach of duty evidence standard Arbetsdomstolen labor dispute

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Arbetsdomstolens förordning (1995:100) kap. 1 § 1
Arbetsdomstolens förordning (1995:100) kap. 1 § 2
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Oberoende Fria Fackföreningars Centralorganissation, O.F.F.C.

mot

Livsmedelsföretagen och Spendrups Bryggeriaktiebolag.

Målet gällde brott mot förhandlingsskyldigheten m.m. Domen innebar att kärandens talan avslogs.

Dom 2020-12-23, målnummer A-84-2019

Ledamöterna: Karin Renman, Ari Kirvesniemi och Veli-Pekka Säikäälä. Enhälligt.

Rättssekreterare: Jonas Eklund