Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 3637/2013 AI generated

Request for transfer of jurisdiction dismissed for failure to pay judicial stamp duty

Case Number Încheierea nr. 3637/2013
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the petition for the transfer of jurisdiction filed by a monastery, ruling that the plaintiff did not comply with the mandatory obligation to pay the judicial stamp duty. The dispute arose from a request to remand civil case No. 2437/321/2012 from the Neamț Court of Appeal, where the proceedings had been suspended; although the plaintiff’s counsel submitted evidence of payment after being cited with the duty to remit specific fees, the Public Prosecutor represented the state’s interest in rejecting the transfer due to the initial failure to conform to the legal obligation. The court’s decision rested on the procedural requirement of Article 40 of the Code of Civil Procedure regarding the suspension of trials and the strict legal obligation to settle judicial fees before a request for jurisdictional transfer can be granted, resulting in a final order with no avenue for appeal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 40 alin. (2) C. proc. civ; Request for transfer of jurisdiction dismissed for failure to pay judicial stamp duty: The dispute arose from a request to remand civil case No. 2437/321/2012 from the Neamț Court of Appeal, where the proceedings had been suspended; although the plaintiff’s counsel submitted evidence of payment after being cited with the duty to remit specific fees, the Public Prosecutor represented the state’s interest in rejecting the transfer due to the initial failure to conform to the legal obligation. The court’s decision rested on the procedural requirement of Article 40 of the Code of Civil Procedure regarding the suspension of trials and the strict legal obligation to settle judicial fees before a request for jurisdictional transfer can be granted, resulting in a final order with no avenue for appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
payment of stamp duty lack of jurisdiction civil dispute order to pay legal fees requesting state
AI generated
ICCJ_96314
Transfer of civil jurisdiction rejected for lack of judicial stamp payment
ICCJ_101010
Transfer of civil jurisdiction petition dismissed due to failure to prepay judicial stamp duty
ICCJ_99737
Petition for transfer of jurisdiction annulled for failure to pay judicial stamp duty
ICCJ_97625
Jurisdiction transfer request dismissed for failure to prepay judicial stamp duty
ICCJ_137449
Request for transfer of jurisdiction dismissed for failure to pay mandatory judicial stamp duty

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 40 alin. (2) C. proc. civ.

The court cited this provision in the analysis leading to the dismissal, as it was the basis for the prior suspension of the main case proceedings referenced in the request for transfer.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

S-a luat în examinare cererea de strămutare formulată de petenta Mănăstirea A.

La apelul nominal, se prezintă avocat A.H., pentru petenta Mănăstirea A., lipsind intimații S.C. și S.M.

Ministerul Public este reprezentat de procuror L.V.

Procedura de citare este legal îndeplinită.

Se referă de magistratul asistent că, potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, judecata dosarului ce face obiectul cererii de strămutare a fost suspendată, conform dispozițiilor art. 40 alin. (2) C. proc. civ. la data de 19 iunie 2013.

Se mai referă că, petenta a fost citată cu mențiunea achitării taxei judiciare de timbru în cuantum de 4 lei și a timbrului judiciar în valoare de 0,3 lei, obligație legală față de care aceasta nu s-a conformat.

Avocat A.H. depune la dosar dovada achitării taxei judiciare de timbru și a timbrului judiciar și solicită admiterea cererii de strămutare, potrivit concluziilor orale formulate.

Reprezentanta Ministerului Public solicită respingerea cererii de strămutare.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petenta Mănăstirea A. privind strămutarea procesului civil ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 2437/321/2012 al Tribunalului Neamț.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi, 11 septembrie 2013.