Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 7207/2012 AI generated

Transfer of civil case to another court denied for lack of statutory grounds.

Case Number Încheierea nr. 7207/2012
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected the request by petitioner M.C. to transfer (strămutare) the case pending in Dâmbovița Tribunal, File No. 2204/315/2012, to another court; no appeal is available against this ruling. The petitioner had sought the transfer of a civil case, arguing grounds for relocation, but the court, having examined the request in a council chamber with the parties absent and the prosecutor recommending rejection, found no basis for granting it. The decision rests on the procedural framework governing requests for case transfer under Romanian civil procedure, where the High Court assesses whether statutory grounds for relocation are met; here, the motion was denied as unfounded.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Transfer of civil case to another court denied for lack of statutory grounds: Se referă de magistratul asistent asupra faptului că dosarul a cărei strămutare se solicită are termen de judecată la data de 4 decembrie 2012.

Keywords

AI generated
Civil Procedure Code statutory grounds procedural review cassation review framework decision transfer rendered moot
AI generated
ICCJ_121368
Transfer of pending civil case refused for lack of statutory grounds.
ICCJ_92737
Case transfer request rejected for lack of statutory grounds.
ICCJ_93904
Transfer of civil case refused; petition dismissed as no statutory grounds shown.
ICCJ_77714
Transfer of civil case denied; strămutare request rejected for lack of statutory grounds.
ICCJ_102261
Transfer of civil case denied for lack of legal grounds, case left in lower court.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

S-a luat în examinare cererea de strămutare formulată de petenta M.C.

La apelul nominal lipsesc părțile, respectiv petenta M.C. și intimații R.F., C.C.L., R.N., G.V. și M.N.

Ministerul Public este reprezentat de procuror Ș.S.

Procedura de citare este legal îndeplinită.

Se referă de magistratul asistent asupra faptului că dosarul a cărei strămutare se solicită are termen de judecată la data de 4 decembrie 2012.

Procurorul pune concluzii de respingere a cererii de strămutare.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petenta M.C. privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul Dosarului nr. 2204/315/2012 al Tribunalului Dâmbovița.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 22 noiembrie 2012.

Procesat de GGC - AS