Legislator Case Law & Legislation
Încheierea nr. 7162/2012 AI generated

Change of venue denied in pending civil suit over partiality concerns

Case Number Încheierea nr. 7162/2012
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected the applicant’s request to transfer case file no. 18181/233/2012 from the Galați District Court to another court, with no further appeal available; the underlying litigation remains pending in the original court. The applicant had sought the transfer (strămutare) of the civil case, arguing grounds for mistrust or suspicion of partiality, while the prosecutor opposed the motion. The court, applying the procedural rules governing change of venue, found no legal basis to justify the transfer and dismissed the application in a closed-chamber session, pronouncing the decision in public hearing.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 93 al. 1 LTF; Change of venue denied in pending civil suit over partiality concerns: 18181/233/2012 from the Galați District Court to another court, with no further appeal available; the underlying litigation remains pending in the original court. The applicant had sought the transfer (strămutare) of the civil case, arguing grounds for mistrust or suspicion of partiality, while the prosecutor opposed the motion. The court, applying the procedural rules governing change of venue, found no legal basis to justify the transfer and dismissed the application in a closed-chamber session, pronouncing the decision in public hearing.

Keywords

AI generated
grounds for cassation procedural objections civil jurisdictional conflict public hearing e-justice change of precedent

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 93 al. 1 LTF
The dispositive dismisses the request for transfer of the case, and the article is cited as the basis for the decision.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 93 al. 1 LTF

The dispositive dismisses the request for transfer of the case, and the article is cited as the basis for the decision.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

S-a luat în examinare cererea formulată de petenta D.V.A. prin care solicită strămutarea cauzei ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 18181/233/2012 al Judecătoriei Galați.

La apelul nominal lipsesc petenta și intimata D.L.

Ministerul Public este reprezentat de procuror A.B.

Procedura este legal îndeplinită.

Se referă de magistratul asistent asupra faptului că, potrivit programului de evidență informatizată al instanțelor, Dosarul nr. 18181/233/2012 al Judecătoriei Galați, a cărui strămutare se cere, are termen de judecată la data de 2 aprilie 2013.

Procurorul pune concluzii de respingere a cererii de strămutare.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petenta D.V.A. prin care solicită strămutarea cauzei ce formează obiectul dosarului nr. 18181/233/2012 al Judecătoriei Galați.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 21 noiembrie 2012.

Procesat de GGC - AS