Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 3393/2013 AI generated

Request for transfer of jurisdiction due to alleged conflict of interest or improper venue

Case Number Încheierea nr. 3393/2013
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the petition for the transfer of jurisdiction filed by the applicant, with the prosecutor concurring in the dismissal; this decision is final and not subject to appeal. The dispute involved a request to transfer a civil case from the Court of Appeal of Brașov to another court. Although the case file indicated a scheduled hearing date of June 27, 2012, which appeared anomalous relative to the filing year, the Court found the procedural requirements for the transfer request to be legally insufficient, resulting in the rejection of the petition.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Request for transfer of jurisdiction due to alleged conflict of interest or improper venue: Respinge cererea formulată de petentul M.D. privind strămutarea procesului civil ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 170/64/2013 al Curții de Apel Brașov.

Keywords

AI generated
civil jurisdictional conflict conflict of interests date of filing referral for lack of jurisdiction decisions concerning reassignment or transfer transfer of tenancy
AI generated
Încheierea nr. 873/2013
Request for transfer of jurisdiction due to scheduled hearing conflict
Încheierea nr. 4334/2012
Request for transfer of civil case jurisdiction due to scheduled hearing date conflict
Încheierea nr. 6680/2012
Transfer of jurisdiction request dismissed due to existing scheduled hearing date
Încheierea nr. 285/2014
Petitioner’s request to transfer civil case jurisdiction due to alleged judicial bias rejected
Încheierea nr. 4481/2013
Request for transfer of jurisdiction dismissed; admissibility of moving pending civil case between appellate courts

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Procedura de citare este legal îndeplinită.

Se referă de magistratul asistent asupra faptului că, potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, Dosarul nr. 170/64/2013 al Curții de Apel Brașov, a cărui strămutare se solicită, are termen de judecată la data de 27 iunie 2012.

Procurorul solicită respingerea cererii de strămutare.

Analizând cererea,

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petentul M.D. privind strămutarea procesului civil ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 170/64/2013 al Curții de Apel Brașov.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi, 14 iunie 2013.