Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 3249/2013 AI generated

Transfer of jurisdiction request dismissed: procedural admissibility and lack of grounds to relocate civil trial

Case Number Încheierea nr. 3249/2013
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the petition for transfer of jurisdiction, meaning the request to move the trial failed and the case remains before the Court of First Instance where it was originally filed. The dispute concerned a procedural motion by the plaintiffs to relocate the trial of civil case no. 3838/212/2011 from the Constanța Court of Appeal to another competent court. The court rejected the application after the public prosecutor’s representative argued against the transfer, finding no grounds to disturb the existing judicial allocation; the decision was issued without recourse as it was a final procedural order.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Fără cale de atac; Transfer of jurisdiction request dismissed: procedural admissibility and lack of grounds to relocate civil trial: The dispute concerned a procedural motion by the plaintiffs to relocate the trial of civil case no. 3838/212/2011 from the Constanța Court of Appeal to another competent court. The court rejected the application after the public prosecutor’s representative argued against the transfer, finding no grounds to disturb the existing judicial allocation; the decision was issued without recourse as it was a final procedural order.

Keywords

AI generated
grounds of jurisdiction civil dispute procedural objections transfer of custody decisions concerning reassignment or transfer dismissal and abandonment of proceedings

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Fără cale de atac
Procedural provision indicating that the decision is final and no further appeal is permitted against this procedural ruling.
AI generated
Încheierea nr. 4954/2013
Transfer of jurisdiction between courts: dismissal of petition for lack of grounds to relocate civil proceedings
Încheierea nr. 3919/2013
Petition for transfer of jurisdiction from Court of Appeal to another instance; rejection due to lack of legal grounds despite valid procedure.
Încheierea nr. 3209/2013
Petition for transfer of civil case jurisdiction dismissed for failure to meet procedural admissibility requirements
Încheierea nr. 2694/2013
Jurisdictional transfer of civil case; failure of statutory grounds for reassignment
Încheierea nr. 5998/2012
Judicial transfer request for civil litigation: adequacy of grounds for jurisdictional relocation

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Fără cale de atac

Procedural provision indicating that the decision is final and no further appeal is permitted against this procedural ruling.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Procedura legal îndeplinită.

Se referă de magistratul asistent asupra faptului că, potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, dosarul a cărui strămutare se solicită are fixat termen la data de 10 septembrie 2013.

Se mai referă și că petenții au depus taxa judiciară de timbru și timbrul judiciar aferent și precizări însoțite de înscrisuri.

Reprezentantul Ministerului Public solicită respingerea cererii de strămutare formulată de petenți, pentru motivele expuse verbal.

Analizând cererea.

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petenții M.I. și M.M., prin care solicită strămutarea judecării procesului civil ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 3838/212/2011 al Tribunalului Constanța.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 11 iunie 2013.