Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 5424/2012 AI generated

Transfer of civil case jurisdiction denied for failure to meet exceptional legal criteria

Case Number Încheierea nr. 5424/2012
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the petitioner's request for the transfer of jurisdiction, resulting in the retention of the case by the Tribunal of Constanța without appeal. The dispute concerned a civil case where the petitioner sought to move the trial to a different court due to a potential conflict of interest or lack of impartiality, while the respondent organizations and the Public Prosecutor opposed the transfer. The court ruled on the motion based on procedural grounds, finding that the criteria for transferring jurisdiction under the Code of Civil Procedure were not met, thereby maintaining the original judicial assignment for the pending civil proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 375-380 Cod. proc. civ; Transfer of civil case jurisdiction denied for failure to meet exceptional legal criteria: The dispute concerned a civil case where the petitioner sought to move the trial to a different court due to a potential conflict of interest or lack of impartiality, while the respondent organizations and the Public Prosecutor opposed the transfer. The court ruled on the motion based on procedural grounds, finding that the criteria for transferring jurisdiction under the Code of Civil Procedure were not met, thereby maintaining the original judicial assignment for the pending civil proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
civil dispute lack of jurisdiction grounds for cassation judicial review pending proceedings ground for review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 375-380 Cod. proc. civ
Procedural basis for the dismissal of the request for transfer of jurisdiction (strămutare), as the High Court exercised its competence to rule on the exceptional transfer of a case between courts of the same instance.
AI generated
Încheierea nr. 5566/2012
Rejection of transfer of jurisdiction request due to failure to substantiate grounds for exceptional judicial movement between courts
Încheierea nr. 3397/2012
Transfer of jurisdiction request dismissed for civil dispute
Încheierea nr. 1112/2014
Transfer of civil jurisdiction rejected where underlying proceedings suspended for lack of interest
Încheierea nr. 3013/2012
Transfer of case denied; original tribunal retains jurisdiction.
Încheierea nr. 801/2014
Request for transfer of civil jurisdiction between appellate courts dismissed

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 375-380 Cod. proc. civ.

Procedural basis for the dismissal of the request for transfer of jurisdiction (strămutare), as the High Court exercised its competence to rule on the exceptional transfer of a case between courts of the same instance.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

S-a luat în examinare cererea de strămutare formulată de petenta T. SCM.

La apelul nominal se prezintă petenta T. SCM, prin avocat F.V. și intimata Uniunea Județeană a Organizațiilor Cooperației Meșteșugărești, prin avocat J.G., lipsă fiind intimatul A.

Ministerul Public este reprezentat de procuror Ș.S.

Procedura legal îndeplinită.

Se referă de magistratul asistent asupra faptului că potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, Dosarul nr. 9585/118/2010 al Tribunalului Constanța a cărui strămutare se solicită are termen de judecată la data de 20 septembrie 2012.

Avocat F.V. solicită admiterea cererii de strămutare.

Avocat J.G. pune concluzii de respingerea a cererii.

Reprezentanta Ministerului Public solicită respingerea cererii de strămutare.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petenta T. SCM prin care solicită strămutarea judecării procesului civil ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 9585/118/2010 al Tribunalului Constanța.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 18 septembrie 2012.

Procesat de GGC - DG