Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 2732/2013 AI generated

Transfer motion moot after underlying case resolved; request denied without appeal

Case Number Încheierea nr. 2732/2013
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as moot the applicant's request to transfer (strămutare) civil case no. 1487/326/2012 of the Harghita Tribunal, because that case had already been resolved on 24 April 2013 before the transfer request was adjudicated; the dismissal is without appeal and leaves the prior resolution of the underlying case in force. The applicant sought a transfer of venue alleging bias or other grounds, but the court, noting the case's closure, ruled the request lacked object. Legally, the decision applies the principle that a transfer motion becomes moot once the underlying case is finally resolved, so no further order on venue was available.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Transfer motion moot after underlying case resolved; request denied without appeal: Respinge cererea formulată de petenta Ț.L. privind strămutarea procesului civil ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 1487/326/2012 al Tribunalului Harghita.

Keywords

AI generated
civil judgment transfer rendered moot grounds for cassation resolution of jurisdictional dispute decisions concerning reassignment or transfer appealable interlocutory decision
AI generated
Încheierea nr. 667/2013
Transfer motion moot after underlying case resolved; transfer request rejected and adjournment denied.
Încheierea nr. 1624/2014
Transfer motion moot after underlying case resolved; application denied.
Încheierea nr. 5024/2012
Transfer request moot after underlying case decided; motion rejected.
Încheierea nr. 7209/2012
Case transfer motion denied as moot where underlying case already decided; no transfer ordered.
Încheierea nr. 877/2014
Transfer motion moot as underlying case already resolved; request rejected.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Se referă de magistratul asistent asupra faptului că, potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, Dosarul nr. 1487/326/2012 al Tribunalului Harghita, a cărui strămutare se solicită, a fost soluționat la data de 24 aprilie 2013.

Avocat Ț.A.E. solicită admiterea cererii de strămutare, pentru motivele invocate în scris, pe care le susține și oral.

Procurorul solicită respingerea cererii de strămutare ca rămasă fără obiect.

Analizând cererea,

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petenta Ț.L. privind strămutarea procesului civil ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 1487/326/2012 al Tribunalului Harghita.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 17 mai 2013.