Stramutare of suspended civil proceedings
Romania (RO)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the application for the transfer (stramutare) of civil case No. 9388/108/2012 pending before the Arad Court of Appeal, ruling that the request was unfounded and rendering the decision final and not subject to appeal. The dispute concerned a procedural motion to relocate the jurisdiction of the suspended civil lawsuit, as the petitioners argued for a transfer while the legal counsel opposing the motion and the court's own assessment indicated the statutory requirements for such a measure were not met. The decisive legal basis relied upon was the procedural status of the case, specifically its suspension under Article 244(1)(1) of the Civil Procedure Code, which rendered the application for transfer inadmissible or unfounded under the applicable jurisdictional transfer norms.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 244 alin. (1) pct. 1 C. proc. civ; Stramutare of suspended civil proceedings: 9388/108/2012 pending before the Arad Court of Appeal, ruling that the request was unfounded and rendering the decision final and not subject to appeal. The dispute concerned a procedural motion to relocate the jurisdiction of the suspended civil lawsuit, as the petitioners argued for a transfer while the legal counsel opposing the motion and the court's own assessment indicated the statutory requirements for such a measure were not met. The decisive legal basis relied upon was the procedural status of the case, specifically its suspension under Article 244(1)(1) of the Civil Procedure Code, which rendered the application for transfer inadmissible or unfounded under the applicable jurisdictional transfer norms.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Se referă de magistratul asistent asupra faptului că, potrivit programului de evidentă informatizată a instanțelor, Dosarul nr. 9388/108/2012 al Tribunalului Arad, a cărui strămutare se solicită, a fost suspendat la data de 18 decembrie 2012, în baza art. 244 alin. (1) pct. 1 C. proc. civ..
Avocat avocat C.R. solicită admiterea cererii de strămutare, pentru motivele invocate în scris, pe care le susține și oral.
Consilier juridic G.T. solicită respingerea cererii de strămutare ca nefondată.
Procurorul solicită admiterea cererii de strămutare.
Analizând cererea,
ÎN NUMELE LEGII
D I S P U N E
Respinge cererea formulată de petenții B.C., C.S., C.M., G.E.M., H.O.H., S:I., B.E., K.I., K.V., K.Ș., C.M.Ă., H.L., B.G.L., D.V.E., V.G., K.M., A.E., V.G.M., C.Ș., B.D., C.C.F., I.V., P.D.D., C.D., M.M., F.A., M.D.M., G.V.M., C.M.T., C.F.V., P.E.D., H.M.D., C.V., P.M., D.D., D.E., H.F., S.V.L., S.O.T., J.M., T.T., A.C., U.P., U.T., U.A., M.P., Z.G., I.I., M.D.I., M.R., M.A., M.O., M.C.A., A.E., B.P., B.L., O.S., T.A., S.D.M., C.A., C.L.S., T.A.D., S.D.D., S.M.C., C.V.I., L.E., D.S., K.A., K.I.M., S.O.F., O.L.E., G.G.C., C.C., S.M., B.L.F., P.T., S.I.Ș., S.V.I., J.I., C.A.D., B.E.C., R.E., C.A.Z., B.G., B.T., C.T., H.P., N.El., M.E., M.M.F., S.M., M.F.V., H.G., B.S., G.V., H.R., B.l.G., R.L., V.A., U.M., M.F., B.Z., I.S., R.M., L.I., L.V., P.R., H.E., H.G.I., D.D., C.N., C.V.O., T.Ș., C.F.E., C.G., T.E., C.E., C.R.A.I., B.A., J.M., P.P.V., P.D.l., B.K. privind strămutarea procesului civil ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 9388/108/2012 al Tribunalului Arad.
Fără cale de atac.
Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 17 mai 2013.