Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 2683/2013 AI generated

Filing an appeal directly with the supreme court instead of the court of first instance, rendering the recourse null under Article 302 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Case Number Decizia nr. 2683/2013
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice declared the appeal filed by the appellants null and void, thereby upholding the lower court's decision to dismiss their claims as inadmissible. The dispute involved a civil lawsuit initiated by the appellants against unspecified defendants, which was rejected at the first instance due to an exception of inadmissibility raised by the court of its own motion; the appellants then challenged this ruling. Relying on Article 302 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which mandates that an appeal must be filed with the court whose decision is being challenged under pain of nullity, the Supreme Court held that the appeal was procedurally defective because it was submitted directly to the High Court instead of the Zalău District Court, rendering the appeal null and the underlying judgment irrevocable.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 302 C. proc. civ; Filing an appeal directly with the supreme court instead of the court of first instance, rendering the recourse null under Article 302 of the Code of Civil Procedure: The dispute involved a civil lawsuit initiated by the appellants against unspecified defendants, which was rejected at the first instance due to an exception of inadmissibility raised by the court of its own motion; the appellants then challenged this ruling. Relying on Article 302 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which mandates that an appeal must be filed with the court whose decision is being challenged under pain of nullity, the Supreme Court held that the appeal was procedurally defective because it was submitted directly to the High Court instead of the Zalău District Court, rendering the appeal null and the underlying judgment irrevocable.

Keywords

AI generated
article of civil procedure procedural nullity filing of a claim objection of unconstitutionality action for annulment appealability of remand decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 302 C. proc. civ
Ground for declaring the appeal null because it was not filed with the court of first instance as required by law.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 969/2010
Nullity of cassation appeal filed with the Supreme Court instead of the court of appeal under Article 302 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Decizia nr. 3373/2005
Appeal filed with appellate court instead of first-instance court renders civil appeal null under Art. 302 CPC
Decizia nr. 1553/2020
Nullity of appeal for direct submission to the High Court instead of the court of first instance
Decizia nr. 5552/2021
Nullity of appeal filed directly with supreme court instead of lower instance; non-compliance with procedural filing requirement under Civil Procedure Code
Decizia nr. 3156/2005
Nullity of extraordinary appeal for filing grounds directly with appellate court rather than lower instance

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 302 C. proc. civ.

Ground for declaring the appeal null because it was not filed with the court of first instance as required by law.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra cauzei de față, constată următoarele:

Prin sentința civilă nr. 4524 din 26 noiembrie 2012 Judecătoria Zalău, a admis excepția inadmisibilitătii cererii de chemare în judecată, invocată din oficiu, și a respins ca inadmisibilă cererea formulată de reclamanții N.I. și N.R..

Împotriva acestei decizii reclamanții au declarat recurs.

Cererea de recurs a fost depusă la Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție la data de 6 decembrie 2012, primind termen de judecată la data de 16 mai 2013.

Analizând excepția nulității recursului, invocată din oficiu, Înalta Curte a arătat următoarele:

Conform art. 302 C. proc. civ. „recursul se depune la instanța a cărei hotărâre se atacă, sub sancțiunea nulității".

În cauză, reclamanții au formulat recurs împotriva sentinței nr. 4524 pronunțată la data de 26 noiembrie 2012 de către Judecătoria Zalău.

Cererea de recurs a fost depusă direct la Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție, în loc să fie înaintată Judecătoriei Zalău, a cărei hotărâre se atacă, așa încât recursul declarat în cauză este nul.

Văzând dispozițiile art. 302 C. proc. civ., instanța va constata nul recursul declarat în cauză.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E

Constată nul recursul declarat de reclamanții N.I. și N.R. împotriva deciziei civile nr. 4524 din 26 noiembrie 2012 Judecătoria Zalău.

Irevocabilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 16 mai 2013.