Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 1933/2013 AI generated

Mootness of a request for case transfer following the prior final adjudication of the underlying civil dispute

Case Number Încheierea nr. 1933/2013
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice (Civil Section I) dismissed without recourse the request for case transfer, leaving the underlying case assigned to the Pitești Court of Appeal. The dispute involved a procedural application by nine petitioners seeking the reassignment of their civil case from the Pitești Court of Appeal to another court. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was that the request had become moot, as the automated court record indicated that the subject matter had already been adjudicated and closed on March 27, 2013, rendering the petition for transfer legally ineffective.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Mootness of a request for case transfer following the prior final adjudication of the underlying civil dispute: Respinge cererea formulată de petenții C.I., D.G., H.V., I.G., M.G., N.T., N.I., P.S. și V.M. privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul Dosarului nr. 17583/109/2012 al Curții de Apel Pitești.

Keywords

AI generated
transfer rendered moot matter in dispute civil judgment reassignment or transfer withdrawal of legal petition appealable interlocutory decision
AI generated
Încheierea nr. 1471/2014
Mootness of civil case transfer request due to prior final adjudication of underlying proceedings
Încheierea nr. 6449/2012
Mootness of civil case transfer request following prior resolution of underlying proceedings
Încheierea nr. 1314/2014
Mootness of case transfer request following prior final adjudication of the underlying civil dispute
Încheierea nr. 3880/2013
Petition for transfer of case dismissed as moot after prior resolution
Încheierea nr. 1930/2013
Mootness of petition to transfer civil case following prior final resolution of underlying proceedings

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Se referă de magistratul asistent asupra faptului că, potrivit programului de evidentă informatizată a instanțelor, dosarul a cărui strămutare se solicită a fost soluționat la 27 martie 2013.

Reprezentanta Ministerului Public solicită respingerea cererii de strămutare, ca rămasă fără obiect.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petenții C.I., D.G., H.V., I.G., M.G., N.T., N.I., P.S. și V.M. privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul Dosarului nr. 17583/109/2012 al Curții de Apel Pitești.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 4 aprilie 2013.